ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5834|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG187

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-26 11:06:00 | 只看该作者

OG187

187. In one of the bloodiest battles of the Civil War, fought at Sharpsburg, Maryland, on September 17, 1862, four times as many Americans were killed as would later be killed on the beaches of Normandy during D-Day.


(A) Americans were killed as


(B) Americans were killed than


(C) Americans were killed than those who


(D) more Americans were killed as there


(E)  more Americans were killed as those who



Key is A.


根据几个明显的错误,可以很快地到答案。可是我很想知道as...as 的


用法。如果A多加一个those, (A) Americans were killed as those, 是否更


好一些呢?什么情况应该补全啊?


沙发
发表于 2004-6-26 13:32:00 | 只看该作者

"those" is superfluous, wordy and thus redundant here, "as" can act as a pronoun in this case. Remember this usage.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-6-26 23:03:00 | 只看该作者

Thanks.

地板
发表于 2004-8-10 04:15:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用tianwan在2004-6-26 13:32:00的发言:

"those" is superfluous, wordy and thus redundant here, "as" can act as a pronoun in this case. Remember this usage.


那么C中的those who为什么wordy? than也可以做代词? 那么许多than that/those 怎么解释?

5#
发表于 2004-8-10 06:37:00 | 只看该作者

当as......as同级比较时, 同主语不同谓语的情况, 多半省略主语......

像这边的four times as many Americans were killed as (Americans) would later be killed

但若是比较宾语时, 则需补出主语:

ex: David has half as many records now as I had last year. (这里则省宾语)

6#
发表于 2005-7-15 13:04:00 | 只看该作者

"David has half as many records now as I had last year. (这里则省宾语)"


两个主语(DAVID和I)都不同,当然要清晰表达出来,所以不是"补出主语"的问题.


187题中可以省去"THOSE"或"AMERCIANS",我觉得与其句子结构有关,这是个被动句,没有宾语,所以省去的后面的主语并不会引起歧义(因为只能是AMERCIANS这个选择)



7#
发表于 2005-9-7 17:02:00 | 只看该作者

GWD24-20 According to a 1996 survey by the National Association of College an University Business Officers, more than three times as many independent institutions of higher education charge tuition and fees of under $8,000 a year than those that charge over $16,000.


A) than those that charge


B) than are charging


C) than to charge


D) as charge


E) as those charging



(answer is E)


Is the "those" here also superfluous?


or it represents a different "independent instituations" , so it is not superfluous?





8#
发表于 2005-9-12 01:06:00 | 只看该作者
同问,不从语法,从语感说A加上those or those who好像更顺畅。
9#
发表于 2005-11-3 13:18:00 | 只看该作者

因为than之前是完整的主谓宾结构,如果省略those就不知道是比较主语还是宾语了,有歧义,所以这里的those不能省。而OG187,大家已经说的很清楚了,只有主语和谓语,省略不会有歧义。之前有个比较的“疱丁解牛”的帖子,总结得很不错,可以去看看!

10#
发表于 2008-1-20 15:06:00 | 只看该作者

coz the subjects are not the same.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 23:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部