[求助] OG 92

92. Never before had taxpayers confronted so many

changes at once as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

(A)  so many changes at once as they had in

(B)  at once as many changes as

(C)  at once as many changes that there were with

(D)  as many changes at once as they confronted in

(E)   so many changes at once that confronted them in

答案是D.

OG解释说A的错误是had的过去完成时用法不对. 可是so many ... as ... 的用法对吗?

以下是引用叮当在2004-8-24 5:23:00的发言：

92. Never before had taxpayers confronted so many

changes at once as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

(A)  so many changes at once as they had in

(B)  at once as many changes as

(C)  at once as many changes that there were with

(D)  as many changes at once as they confronted in

(E)   so many changes at once that confronted them in

答案是D.

OG解释说A的错误是had的过去完成时用法不对. 可是so many ... as ... 的用法对吗?

so many ... as ... 的用法不对, 但ETS懒得再说了.

我同意so many as 是少用，特別是在肯定句中幾乎不用，換句話說，否定句中講so many as是可以接受的，這在OG有題目可以證明，但一時沒給翻出來。

我的看法是，這A選項錯誤，恐怕還是敗在動詞不對

why the use of

so many....as...

here are wrong?

以下是引用叮当在2004-8-24 5:23:00的发言：

92. Never before had taxpayers confronted so many

changes at once as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

(A)  so many changes at once as they had in

(B)  at once as many changes as

(C)  at once as many changes that there were with

(D)  as many changes at once as they confronted in

(E)   so many changes at once that confronted them in

答案是D.

OG解释说A的错误是had的过去完成时用法不对. 可是so many ... as ... 的用法对吗?

同问,难道是因为出现的是never,而非no,not,所以依然视为肯定句么?

同问,难道是因为出现的是never,而非no,not,所以依然视为肯定句么?

______

正解 否定的不是动词，不算否定

只有not no的句子才是否定句，其他的什么never啊，等的，算是肯定句！！

为什么E选项里面说so many...that..是不对的？如果不看后面，但从这个用法来看应该是有的啊。。

迷茫了，请指点。