allwen99这个问题问的非常好,为了有一个合理的解释,tianwan 的回答算是能说的通,但不清楚instead of后面不可以接不定式,是否有明确的语法出处?对这个解释,我个人还是持怀疑的态度,麻烦tianwan能回答一下. 我的观点还是同allwen99的原始观点: A选项:to allow members of the jury to go home 与to confine them to a hotel 并列,通过instead of来连接,共同作a motion的定语.意思是:Judge B否定了一个提议, 这个提议是:允许陪审团成员回家而不是把他们限制在宾馆里.这个意思是很清晰的,而且也很符合逻辑的. 而答案E选项的意思,则有些牵强.按E来分析,go home与be confined to hotel并列,通过rather than连接,共同作allow members of the jury的宾语补足语.形成allow sb to do A rather than do B结构,意思是:允许某人作某事A而不是允许某人做某事B,这样在此句中就是---这个提议是:允许陪审团成员回家而不是允许他们被限制在宾馆. "允许他们被限制在宾馆"怎么看怎么不通. 总之,A无论结构还是意思都比E清楚,A唯一的困惑就是instead of后面是否可以接不定式这种结构?instead of作为正确选项,大全606是有先例的,但可惜的是这题不能有力的证明或者否定instead of后面是否可以接不定式 ,如下: 大全606 Research during the past several decades on the nature of language and the processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity. (A) that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity (B) of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity (C) by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity (D) by which it is produced and understood have revealed great complexity rather than underlying simplicity(A) (E) by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
个人观点,欢迎大家讨论! |