ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1069|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原创]比较问题~that/it was 分不清

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-6-3 00:12:00 | 只看该作者

[原创]比较问题~that/it was 分不清

If current trends continue, by the year 2010 carbon emissions in the United States
                will soar to a level more than one-third higher than were those in 1990, according to official projections. (B)

 

(A) will soar to a level more than one-third higher than were those

(B) will soar to a level more than one-third higher than that

(C) would soar to a level more than one-third higher than it was

(D) would soar to a level more than one-third higher than those

(E) would soar to a level more than one-third higher than they were

答案是通过条件状语主句将来时,从句现在时判断的.

但是如果将C 中的would 改为will ,是否正确呢?

 

沙发
发表于 2008-6-3 10:35:00 | 只看该作者

但是如果将C 中的would 改为will ,是否正确呢? 我觉得不正确。原文应该是:

by the year 2010 carbon emissions in the United States
                will soar to a level more than one-third higher than (the level)in 1990

C中多了一个was。但是,B中的that和C中的it都可以指代the levl么?that 和it的指代有什么区别么?

还望nn赐教

 

板凳
发表于 2008-6-3 10:59:00 | 只看该作者
有一個前辈的帖子解释你的问题很好,抱歉,我当时没有记住连结。

以下是他的说明:

    

it/they通用名词是不带限定修饰成分的通用概念,不论何时何地都是它,


    

that/those具体名词则相反,指代具体事物且通常带介词结构等修饰成分,修饰成分不同则指代的事物不同.换了时间地点也不同


    
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-6-3 20:52:00 | 只看该作者

PREP破解中有提到:

that 是的指代名词前的修饰成分

it 指代 主句的主语>主句的宾语>从句的主语>从句的宾语

如果主句的主语是有修饰成分的名字,那么it 是可以指有修饰成分的名词的啊~~

请nn指点

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-1 09:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部