og-86 解答下WITH的问题

jianhu8246 · 发表于 2010-9-1 06:57:26

86. The results of the company’s cost-cutting measures
are evident in its profi ts, which increased 5 percent
during the fi rst 3 months of this year after it fell over
the last two years.
(A) which increased 5 percent during the fi rst
3 months of this year after it fell
(B) which had increased 5 percent during the fi rst
3 months of this year after it had fallen
(C) which have increased 5 percent during the fi rst
3 months of this year after falling
(D) with a 5 percent increase during the fi rst
3 months of this year after falling
(E) with a 5 percent increase during the fi rst
3 months of this year after having fallen

C 和D 对比 D为什么WITH不行呢看OG的解释觉得不是很明白！！NN出来给菜鸟解答下

jianhu8246 · 发表于 2010-9-1 07:04:59

OG的解释说 WITH修饰的对象有问题，我想问 TIWH 到底是怎么修饰前面的对象的是像 WHICH一样只修饰最近的一个还是想ING形式的可以跳跃修饰主语或整个句子那在什么情况下 WITH才不会产生这种修饰对象不清的情况呢请解答一下非常感谢！！！！！！

sophia000 · 发表于 2010-9-1 09:09:55

我认为with的范围比较大，不太能明确它到底是with的之前的那件事，而后面的句子非常明确的是在修饰profits，这里用which比with要明确。个人感觉og的解释中很强调修饰的明确性，即能够使用更确切的修饰方法时，就不要选择囊括性大的，这点符合gmat所说的高效简洁的表达

og-86 解答下WITH的问题

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()