這樣解釋對嗎?

GiGi · 发表于 2004-1-3 23:16:00

258.During her lecture the speaker used map to clarify directional terms, for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that winds are designated by the direction from which they come.
(A) or not everyone in attendance was knowledgeable
(B) for everyone in attendance did not know
(C) with everyone in attendance not knowing
(D) with everyone attending not knowledgeable
(E) for not everyone attending knew
請問(b)與(e)間不(b)是否是因為(e)較為簡潔?還是其他原因?

dreadpower · 发表于 2004-1-3 23:45:00

ETS-SC表示部分否定用not all，不用all....not

turtlechen · 发表于 2004-1-4 03:40:00

(B) for everyone in attendance did not know
每個人都不知道
(E) for not everyone attending knew
並非每個人都知道（有人知，有人不知）

意義不同！

這樣解釋對嗎?

這樣解釋對嗎?

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()