ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1116|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]GWD-TN1-7 help!!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-13 10:20:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]GWD-TN1-7 help!!!

GWD1-Q7:

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A.      that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

B.       that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times

C.      that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

D.      CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

E.       CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times

 请问:1、既然compare to是比喻、比拟的意思,在这道题里怎么说得通呢?为什么全部都是compare to而不是compare with  呢?我觉得好像是在比较而不是比喻啊?

 请问:1、既然compare to是比喻、比拟的意思,在这道题里怎么说得通呢?为什么全部都是compare to而不是compare with  呢?我觉得好像是在比较而不是比喻啊?

          2、B错在哪里呢?a ratio that compares to 42 times作同位语不是比C的更简洁吗?

          2、B错在哪里呢?a ratio that compares to 42 times作同位语不是比C的更简洁吗?

         恳请各位同学指教啊。。。

         恳请各位同学指教啊。。。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-13 10:28:04编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-5-13 17:04:00 | 只看该作者
B错在 a ratio that compares to 42 times中的compares不应该用主动语态
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-13 22:00:00 | 只看该作者
原来如此!!!多谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-11 17:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部