ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1183|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请问GWD6-1

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-4 16:48:00 | 只看该作者

请问GWD6-1

GWD-8-Q20:

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

 

A.      Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

B.       Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

C.      The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also

D.      The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also

E.       The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it

 答案选D

而我选B

沙发
发表于 2008-5-5 10:15:00 | 只看该作者

which就近修饰farmland不合适吧,原句的意思是systematic clearing of forests gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture不能改变原句的意思。个人vote for A。倒装语序怎么可以随便改变。

ps的语法上确实挑不出毛病来,但是总觉得语气不对。


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-5 10:18:15编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2008-5-5 12:02:00 | 只看该作者

which不能只带前面提到的整句话

D created和gave并列,用but it also是因为前面内容说好话,后面内容说不好的,所以有个转折在中间 ,it 指代The systematic clearing of forests

地板
发表于 2008-5-5 13:29:00 | 只看该作者

个人觉得是DA有很知名的错误,就是Anot only ….but also是倒装句,那就是说A确定了not only……, but also的句型。所以but it also肯定是错误的,把it去掉,那A就是标准答案了。明显it多余,重复,并且多主语加指代不清。

C的错误在于which指代不清,因为which优先指代前一个名词,就是farmland,那就完全改变句意(farmland不能gave consumers inexpensive houses and furniture.即使认为which指代the systematic clearing of forests,也还是不太对。因为原句中2个成份是并列的,而这里不把gave变成了从属成份,注意:插入的定语从句式可以省略而不影响句意的。可是这里gave后面的内容怎么看也是很重要,不可省。

只有C没有语法错误,尽管句子写的并不好,但是我们只能排除错误选项。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 17:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部