100.Proponents of artificial intelligence say they will be able to make computers that can understand English and other human languages,recognize objects,and reason as an expert does--computers that will be used to diagnose equipment breakdowns, deciding whether to authorize a loan,or other purposes such as these. (A) as an expert does-computers that will be used to diagnose equipment breakdowns,deciding whether to authorize a loan,or other purposes such as these (B) as an expert does,which may be used for purposes such as diagnosing equipment breakdowns or deciding whether to authorize a loan (C) like an expert-computers that will be used for such purposes as diagnosing equipment breakdowns or deciding whether to authorize a loan (D) like an expert,the use of which would be for purposes like the diagnosis of equipment breakdowns or the decision whether or not a loan should be authorized (E) like an expert,to be used to diagnose equipment breakdowns,deciding whether to authorize a loan or not,or the like Parallelism +Rhetorical construction The sentence presents three functions of intelligent computers,but these functions(to diagnose…,deciding… or other purposes) are not written in parallel ways.Moreover, the final function is vague.Turning this final function into an introductory statement and using parallel forms for the two dements diagnosing and deciding creates a stronger sentence.Either the clause,as an expert does, or the prepositional phrase, like an expert, is correct and idiomatic in this sentence. A The series to diagnose…,deciding…,or other purposes should be expressed in parallel ways. B which has no clear referent. C Correct.Moving for such purposes as to an introductory position strengthens the sentence;diagnosing and deciding are parallel. D To diagnose and deciding are not parallel;the use of which would be for purposes like is wordy and awkward;which has no clear referent. E To be used, deciding, and or the like are not parallel. The correct answer is C.
各 位前辈,我不太明白的就是为什么这里还能再出现一个名词,作为类似的伴随状语或者同位语,是因为“-”的关系吗?这类题目我都不是太懂,如果真要我硬理解这样的结构 的话,我会理解成,I am A(名词), B(另一样东西,但是等同)。或者说是They can make(制造) computers-(which is)computers。 还有就是为什么用了which反而是no clear referent了。
是我第一次提问,请大家赐教~谢谢了
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-5-1 16:47:14编辑过] |