ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2054|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gamt rule中,which能不能指代前面的整个句子?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-4-29 23:49:00 | 只看该作者

gamt rule中,which能不能指代前面的整个句子?

同题目
沙发
发表于 2008-4-29 23:58:00 | 只看该作者
不能,大多改用分词形式或者将which改为某个名词
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-4-30 00:13:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢leogm,但是在紫皮79 (og10th 38)中

38. Scientists have observed large concentrations of heavy-metal deposits in the upper twenty centimeters of Baltic Sea sediments, which are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there.
            

(A) Baltic Sea sediments, which are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there
            

(B) Baltic Sea sediments, where the growth of industrial activity is consistent with these findings
            

(C)
            
Baltic Sea sediments, findings consistent with its growth of industrial activity
                    

(D) sediments from the Baltic Sea, findings consistent
            with the growth of industrial activity in the
            area

(E) sediments from the Baltic Sea, consistent with the
            growth of industrial activity there
            

在紫皮的解释中,有这么一句(指原句中,即A中):As the sentence is written , which seems to refer back to the whole previous clause

它这么解释是说这种refer方式不对呢,还是说refer 的对象不对?

在紫皮的解释中,有这么一句(指原句中,即A中):As the sentence is written , which seems to refer back to the whole previous clause

它这么解释是说这种refer方式不对呢,还是说refer 的对象不对?

地板
发表于 2008-4-30 10:12:00 | 只看该作者

此题首要错误是Baltic Sea sediments,容易让人以为是一种 sediments,与句意不符

其次考察“consistent with the
            growth of industrial activity there ”修饰对象的理解,显然不会是Baltic Sea ,而应该是整个前句,所以用findings一词替代。

解释中用了seems to,正说明了这种用法不正确,因为which,在GMAT中,不能代替前面整个句子。

我也有几个语法问题,发帖了一直没人回复,请大家帮我解答一下,谢谢!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-23 00:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部