ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1166|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

深度挖据OG10th 128(og11th 80)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-30 16:47:00 | 只看该作者

深度挖据OG10th 128(og11th 80)

128. New hardy varieties of rice show promise of pro­ducing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.

(A)  requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties

(B)   requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation

(C)  requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties

(D)  application of commercial fertilizer and irriga­tion that was required by earlier high-yielding varieties

(E)   irrigation and application of commercial fertil­izer that were required by earlier high-yielding varieties

这道鸟题十分有意思,兄弟我觉得是把修饰问题挖据的淋漓尽致。

首先,拿到题目,我们先用动词优先,杀A,B,C。再把剩下两个选项比较,发现就是两个关键名词位置不同。再细心一看,发现一个是was,一个是were,立刻明白到,D中的required by earlier high-yielding varieties只修饰irrigation,而E中的required by earlier high-yielding varieties修饰两个关键词irrigation和appication,根据忠于原文的规定,杀D,让required by earlier high-yielding varieties修饰两个关键词。

这个杀法很爽。哥们再深度挖掘一下,觉得这条题要捕捉的ETS出题思路是修饰这个问题。

看A选项,首先,用costly修饰requirements就不合逻辑,其次,earlier high-yielding varieties只是修饰了application,同样,B,C和D也犯了同样错误,不是只修饰requirements,就是只修饰了irrigation。

大家觉得是不是这样?欢迎拍砖。

沙发
发表于 2008-5-30 21:12:00 | 只看该作者

用costly修饰requirements就不合逻辑吗?能不能翻译成是需要付出很高代价的需求呢?

嘿嘿,偶是新手,刚看语法还不到一个星期,要是不对,欢迎大家拍~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 05:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部