ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3284|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 28-1

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-10-7 16:18:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 28-1

28-1: Scientists claim that the discovery of the first authenticated mammal bones in amber could provide important clues of determining, in addition to how, when mammals colonized the islands of the West Indies.


A: of determining, in addition to how, when mammals colonized the islands of the West Indies


B: in the determination of how and when the islands of the West Indies were colonized by mammals


C: to determine how mammals colonized the islands of the West Indies and when they did


D: for determining when the islands of the West Indies were colonized by mammals and how they were


E: for determining how and when mammals colonized the islands of the West Indies



网上很多G友的答案为E,但是我有一点不明provide sth for doing这种用法是否可行?是否to determine更好些?

沙发
发表于 2005-10-8 14:35:00 | 只看该作者

c Ce中有争议,主要在于provide sb to do sth 表达更好,以及cwhen they did的表达有些罗唆,确实ehow and when连起来带句子更清楚。但是个人更倾向于d,介词for+动词ing形式在gmat里基本上是十恶不赦的啊~~

板凳
发表于 2005-10-9 19:28:00 | 只看该作者
不知楼上的GG为何倾向D,主动应该优于被动啊
地板
发表于 2005-10-9 19:29:00 | 只看该作者
不知楼上的GG为何倾向于D,主动应该优于被动啊
5#
发表于 2005-11-6 22:57:00 | 只看该作者

有结果了么,这题?

6#
发表于 2005-12-8 14:14:00 | 只看该作者

我之前选择C,现在改选E了。


for doing确实在gmat中不太好,但是这种情况之发生在使用for表示动作时


例如:for bringing之类 这里的determine不属于具体动作,所以for determining还是可以的。 如果把C改成when they did so,我就会选择C答案。

7#
发表于 2006-1-11 16:26:00 | 只看该作者
d是被动呀,不考虑
8#
发表于 2006-1-11 16:40:00 | 只看该作者

if C is provide clues to determining , it is much better?

9#
发表于 2006-4-24 00:37:00 | 只看该作者
there's another Gwd that has a question in which "evidence for doing sth". I think all should check it out. Clue for doing sth and evidence for doing sth should be the same.
10#
发表于 2006-8-11 09:59:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-22 12:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部