ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1278|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11-45,问个新问题...

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-3-28 12:01:00 | 只看该作者

OG11-45,问个新问题...

According to some analysts, the gains in the stock market reflect growing confidence that the economy
    will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier
    in the year and instead come in for a "soft landing," followed by a gradual increase in business activity.

(A)            that the economy will avoid the recession that many had feared earlier in the year and instead come

(B)           in the economy to avoid the recession, what many feared earlier in the year, rather to come

(C)           in the economy's ability to avoid the recession, something earlier in the year many had feared, and instead to come

(D)           in the economy to avoid the recession many were fearing earlier in the year, and rather to come

(E)           that the economy will avoid the recession that was feared earlier this year by many, with it instead coming

答案选A

我想问一下,will avoid 与 will instead平行的话,那为什么avoid后面跟的是recession,但instead后面跟的是come in for?

这个后面的成分是不需要对称的吗??

关于平行对称的问题一直很困惑,一知半解的,平行的两部分不需要完全结构相同吗?

谢谢!!!!

沙发
发表于 2008-3-28 14:16:00 | 只看该作者
The economy will avoid the recession...and in stead (the economy will) come in for a "soft landing,"...

Here, "the economy" is the subjects, "avoid" & "come in for" are the parellel verbs, "the recession" and "a 'soft landing'" are objects.
Therefore, to answer your questions:
我想问一下,will avoid 与 will instead平行的话,那为什么avoid后面跟的是recession,但instead后面跟的是come in for?
Because, will avoid & will come in for are parellel.

这个后面的成分是不需要对称的吗??

关于平行对称的问题一直很困惑,一知半解的,平行的两部分不需要完全结构相同吗?

Absolutely, the key is to identify which parts are parellel.

Hope this helps...
板凳
发表于 2008-3-28 14:34:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Haling在2008-3-28 14:16:00的发言:
The economy will avoid the recession...and in stead (the economy will) come in for a "soft landing,"...

Here, "the economy" is the subjects, "avoid" & "come in for" are the parellel verbs, "the recession" and "a 'soft landing'" are objects.
Therefore, to answer your questions:
我想问一下,will avoid 与 will instead平行的话,那为什么avoid后面跟的是recession,但instead后面跟的是come in for?
Because, will avoid & will come in for are parellel.

这个后面的成分是不需要对称的吗??

关于平行对称的问题一直很困惑,一知半解的,平行的两部分不需要完全结构相同吗?

Absolutely, the key is to identify which parts are parellel.

Hope this helps...

 Excellent!

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-28 22:40:00 | 只看该作者

怎么能一眼看出来省略了那么多啊?

我绝对反应不过来...

5#
发表于 2008-4-7 23:30:00 | 只看该作者
先声明我是个菜鸟,这个题我也是看了很久,本来也是一头雾水不知道到底是谁跟谁平行,但是看见你补出来的句子我似乎明白了。
首先这个句子是。。。and instead。。。的结构(具体我也不知道怎么说),表转折
然后就比较容易了,是avoid 和 come in for 平行
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 10:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部