FT rank与US news rank 哪个更权威？

dursy · 发表于 2008-3-24 21:59:00

FT rank 与US news rank 有的学校排名差别很大。该看哪个呢？

慕容楠生 · 发表于 2008-3-24 22:06:00

个人以为后者。。

Whitney · 发表于 2008-3-24 22:46:00

I think that better ranking is from Forbes, which lists 5-y post-MBA salary;

180-200k      H/S/W/GBS    /NYU/ Tuck/Columbia (Wall st factor?)

140-179k        Darden/Yale/Kellogg/MIT/Haas/Cornell/UCLA/USC (USC@140k due to big city?)

100~139k      Duke (Duke@130k! ??)> other top 20-30 b-school > rest of top 50 (Rice@128k due to big city factor?)
There is only minor difference between a school ranking at 25 vs a school ranking at 50;

IceCo · 发表于 2008-3-25 03:11:00

You need to look into the meaning behind each ranking. Personally (and after seeng many threads on different forums), I think the two that reflect the reality more are BusinessWeek and US News. I personally find FT not so accurate.

No matter how rankings vary, the top 10 MBA list won't change that much (at least for the next few years).

winterblaste · 发表于 2008-3-25 08:05:00

以下是引用Whitney在2008-3-24 22:46:00的发言：
I think that better ranking is from Forbes, which lists 5-y post-MBA salary;

180-200k      H/S/W/GBS    /NYU/ Tuck/Columbia (Wall st factor?)

140-179k        Darden/Yale/Kellogg/MIT/Haas/Cornell/UCLA/USC (USC@140k due to big city?)

100~139k      Duke (Duke@130k! ??)> other top 20-30 b-school > rest of top 50 (Rice@128k due to big city factor?)
There is only minor difference between a school ranking at 25 vs a school ranking at 50;

Interesting.

Tuck has a much higher ranking in this list. Ross is out of Top 60.

FT rank与US news rank 哪个更权威？

FT rank与US news rank 哪个更权威？

所属分类: 商学院申请

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()