分词不可以和定语从句平行么？？

135.
                Intar, the oldest Hispanic theater company in New York, has moved away from the Spanish classics and now it draws on the works both of contemporary Hispanic authors who live abroad and of those in the United States.

(A) now it draws on the works both of contemporary Hispanic authors who live abroad and of those

(B) now draws on the works of contemporary Hispanic authors, both those who live abroad and those who live

(C) it draws on the works of contemporary Hispanic authors now, both those living abroad and who live

(D) draws now on the works both of contemporary Hispanic authors living abroad and who are（B）

(E) draws on the works now of both contemporary Hispanic authors living abroad and those

In choices A and C, it intrudes between the halves of the compound verb has moved... and [now] draws to introduce a new grammatical subject, thereby creating a run-on sentence: the inclusion of it requires a comma after classics to set off the new independent clause. The placement of now is awkward in C, and the construction living abroad... and who is not parallel in C and D. Misplacement of words creates ambiguity in E: for example, the positioning of both immediately before the phrase describing the authors suggests that there are only two contemporary Hispanic authors living abroad. The logical word placement and parallel phrasing of B, the best choice, resolve such confusions.

我想问的是，分词和定从都是做定语修饰前面名词的，为什么不能平行呢？而且定从是可以和介词短语平行做定语的~~~~求救~

这个问题太好了，帮顶。

我只是觉得用分词修饰不好并且这样子不是最优的平行结构(比起B来)，但是觉得应该可以平行...不过OG好像说得很坚决的样子。

求解...

单纯从语法角度讲，在连词and前后的句子功能（成分）一致即可构成平行，但是，从表达上讲，如果前后两部分的内容可以形成一样的结构来表达意思，则更好。例如我们说“红的花和绿的树衬在一起很好看”，而不会说“红的花和树是绿色的衬在一起很好看”。