ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2904|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG128 是否用were消除了歧义?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-14 22:23:00 | 只看该作者

OG128 是否用were消除了歧义?

128. New hardy varieties of rice show promise of pro­ducing high yields



without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial



fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.


(A)  requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by


earlier high-yielding varieties



(B)   requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of



commercial fertilizer and irrigation



(C)  requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties



(D)  application of commercial fertilizer and irriga­tion that was required



by earlier high-yielding varieties



(E)   irrigation and application of commercial fertil­izer that were required



by earlier high-yielding varieties



E中的that是否构成了指向fertilizer的歧义呢?但是were消除了这种



歧义。



还是说,that本来就在语法上指向irrigation and application??

沙发
发表于 2005-5-4 23:55:00 | 只看该作者
Up
板凳
发表于 2005-5-5 00:12:00 | 只看该作者
that were 是一定要连用的呀,如果一起去掉确实是产生了歧义。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 23:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部