ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1078|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11紫色79题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-10-11 19:50:00 | 只看该作者

OG11紫色79题

79  Scientists have observed large concentrations of heavy-metal deposits in the upper twenty centimeters of Baltic Sea sedimentswhich are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there.

(A)  Baltic Sea sedimentswhich are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there

(B)  Baltic Sea sedimentswhere the growth of industrial activity is consistent with these findings

(C)  Baltic Sea sedimentsfindings consistent with its growth of industrial activity

(D)  sediments from the Baltic Seafindings consistent with the growth of industrial activity in the area

(E)  sediments form the Baltic SeaConsistent with the growth of industrial activity there

Grammatical construction + Logical predication

This ambiguous sentence can be clarified by asking a series of questionsThe are in the upper twenty centimeters of what? Of the sediments, not of the Baltic Sea, so it is dearer to place sediments direly after centimetersAs the sentence is writtenwhich seems to refer back to the whole previous clauseSubstituting a nounfindings, makes the reference clearWhere has the growth of industrial activity taken place? There is too vague and makes it seem that the industry is taking place in the sedimentsReplacing there with the more specific in the area solves this problem

A  Baltic Sea sediments is hard to understandwhich has no logical referentthere is too vague.

B  Baltic Sea sediments is hard to understandwhere has no logical referent

C  Baltic Sea sediments is hard to understandits does not have a referent

D  CorrectThis sentence is logical and clearSediments from the Baltic Sea is a clear referencefindings refers back to the scientists’ observationsin this area identifies a place more specifically

E  The phrase beginning with consistent illogically describes the Baltic Sea

The correct answer is D

请教的是,题干中逗号前后两句话是什么关系,WHICH是指代什么,修饰什么的?解释中强调的位置的问题,是依据什么判断?


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-10-11 19:50:12编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-10-16 20:55:00 | 只看该作者
顶啊.请帮忙
板凳
发表于 2007-10-16 21:47:00 | 只看该作者

1,前后2句的关系:scientists have observed ...concentrations...., findings consistent with(同位语从句,解释concentrations);

2, which的修饰。原句中which 修饰容易产生歧义,可以看成是修饰sediments, 或者concentrations,所以不好;

3,改成In the area 要比there 好,因为there 可能是 the uppper centimeters,也可能是Baltic sea sediments.

我的粗浅理解。共同探讨。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 22:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部