谢谢斑竹的回答,有些理解大家选C的理由。可是仍觉得不够信服: 找了仅有的几个《逻辑大全》里面的ever since,还是发现有不用完成时态的一例句子,这个例子说明不是绝对的规则吧: Emily suspected that apples are unhealthy ever since she almost choked to death while eating an apple when she was a child. Now, evidence that apples treated with certain pesticides can be health hazards shows that Emily’s long-held belief is fully justified.
另外关于of, (大全487)白勇讲这道题时说,(这道题apparatus对that本没有问题,想说的是human eye和insect's eye) 人的眼可以用human eye,非所有格形式,名词作修饰语,而昆虫的眼就只能用’S所有格形式,不能直接说insect eye.如果按照斑竹LES所言的强调关系,这里是应该强调从属关系吧?所以是‘S或者OF可以表达。
如果承认上面的推理,则说明名词+名词也可以表示从属关系,只是在人这个环境内可以部分使用。
487-16-10. Like the color-discriminating apparatus of the human eye, insects’ eyes depend on recording and comparing light intensities in three regions of the electromagnetic spectrum.
(A) insects’ eyes depend on
(B) an insect eye depends on
(C) that of insects depend on the
(D) that of an insect’s eye depends on(D)
(E) that of an insect’s is dependent on the
我觉得,human对应horses是对的,human runners 对应horses,好像就差了一个意义.人是修饰语,马是核心词,能对应么? 还有一点啊,赛马的时候,是人马合一,这里想说的意思是"马没有表现提高",还是"人马组合 没有表现提高"呢?如果用those of horses 显然就是说参加赛马的"赛马者"没有提高成绩.或者指他们的组合.如果考"汽车赛手"呢?难道能把汽车和人的赛跑者直接比么比么? 所以应当考虑runners of horses的可行性吧.
更有说服力的如果选择E,一般过去时,则是与原句的":"之后未划线部分的时态完美对应: Derby tine (这里可能是time,为typo) of 1:59 2/5 was set in 1973 and remained unsurpassed more than a quarter of a century later. 对应broke the four-minute mile in 1954 and consistently recorded faster times ever since
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-24 7:43:10编辑过] |