ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (ENXS)

00:00:00

New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1780|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og128没有问过的问题,请nn指教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-14 17:05:00 | 只看该作者

og128没有问过的问题,请nn指教

128. New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of
irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.
(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties
(B) requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
        
(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties
(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high-yielding varieties
(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high-yielding varieties

Answer to Question 128
Choice E, the best answer, clearly and grammatically expresses the idea that two costly procedures, irrigation
and the application of... fertilizer, were required by earlier high-yielding varieties of rice. In A, the placement
of by earlier... varieties immediately after application of fertilizer suggests that the varieties applied the
fertilizer. In B and D, the phrase application of... fertilizer and irrigation is ambiguous in meaning: it cannot be
clearly determined whether applying fertilizer and irrigating are a single operation or two distinct operations
. In C,
only irrigation--not both irrigation and fertilization--is clearly associated with the earlier... varieties of rice.

我的问题是,为什么B会产生ambiguity呢?前面不是有requirements吗?虽然我知道B不如E好,但是requirements不足以消除它的ambiguity吗?请高手看看

沙发
发表于 2006-7-14 23:02:00 | 只看该作者
in B, application
        of
    
commercial fertilizer and irrigation are two different things, here, it gives people the feeling that it is the application of irrigation that is costly, when in fact, irrigation itself is independent.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-15 09:58:00 | 只看该作者
我明白你的意思,但是这样的说法和og答案是大同小异的,还是不能解释requirements能不能消除ambiguity的问题,照og的答案,应该是不行的……算了,我想这大概也是ets的意思,不能通过其他句子的部分来消除某部分的ambiguity吧。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-15 10:01:00 | 只看该作者

还是谢谢你,哈

5#
发表于 2006-10-30 23:50:00 | 只看该作者

requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
    

我知道你的意思了,现回答如下:

requirements by (earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer) and irrigation

requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
    

这样会有歧义了吧?


6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-21 22:19:00 | 只看该作者
哇,哈哈,我事隔3年才看到当年的问题,觉得我怎么能看的明白题目呢?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-19 13:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部