请教大全885 section7-25，一个结构问题

ecsniffer · 发表于 2003-12-6 15:34:00

25.Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when the ownership of both property and the means of production is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not a license granted by government and revokable at whim.
(A) is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not
(B) are regarded as individuals’ inalienable rights, and that it not be
(C) is regarded as an individual’s inalienable right, not as
(D) are regarded as an individual’s inalienable rights, not when they are
(E) is regarded as the inalienable rights of an individual, not when it is
the key:C，同意这个答案。
我不明白的是not as a license granted by government and revokable at whim在这里做什么成分？我发觉gmat语法中好多这样的结构。同位语么？有点不象，not as---好像不是前面as----的等价表达。那是什么成分？请帮忙解释！

rabbitbug · 发表于 2003-12-6 20:22:00

从句意上面来看: ......当...的所有权被认为是私人不可剥夺的权利, 而不是被认为是政府授予的许可证可以被任意取消. 这样看来,你所问的那个部分: not as......whim, 就是前面的as...的并列成分. 个人意见,你参考一下看看能否解释的通?

liweiseed · 发表于 2006-1-25 10:05:00

但是如果用AS，最后的revokable at whim在第二个AS中作什么成分呢？是不是应该选E?

liweiseed · 发表于 2006-1-25 14:11:00

ding 一下

蓝夕叶子 · 发表于 2006-10-27 13:29:00

a license granted by government and revokable at whim

revokable at whim是和granted by government并列的成分。C选项很完美啊，平行简洁

E选项中的When在句意上也解释不通。

aborigin · 发表于 2006-10-27 16:26:00

Ding！

把上面的句子简化一下吧。
A is regarded as B, not as C.
如果是as B 与 not as C并列的话，是不是少了个连词？

aqualon · 发表于 2006-10-27 17:24:00

not as.... 不是看作.... 在这里表示状语来补充说明前的regard as....

不知大家怎么认为的？

easy4meeeeee · 发表于 2007-7-16 13:41:00

1 .as和not as 并列, 作为一个整体去跟随regard

即 regared as..., (regard) not as

2 .连词and或but被省略可能跟句子意思有关:

因为该句子陈述的是一个法定的事实, 逗号前后两个部分的意思并非承接或转折关系. 不知道这样理解对不对啊

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-16 13:41:38编辑过]

请教大全885 section7-25，一个结构问题

请教大全885 section7-25，一个结构问题

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()