各位XDJM以前的讨论共计11页,综合NN kencheng、斑竹Gonghao 的建议,本题答案应该为A: 概括各位NN分析,要点如下: B的错误如下: 代词指代歧义:his 指代不清; and also累赘: also在这里完全是redundant; sb's doing sth的用法错误:his envisioning of 不如 a vision of; 以下为各位NN发言精华部分,节省大家看11页讨论帖的时间: ———————————————————————————— NN质疑B:B. The ninetheenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early expreiments in his "Essay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found. 代词指代歧义:his--〉whose? So the first conspicuous flaw of B is ambiguity . Except for the ambiguity, if 'his' is HD's, it sounds ugly when we read 'his envisioning of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found' because he should be in place of Davy; if RB's, the logic meaning turns rediculous, 'HD's book, a book which is the resuls of his experiments, is a critique and RB's evisioning, ' 'since' is a prep, so A is correct. 第一题一位老外学生指出B的一点根本错误,我认为很有道理,大家请看过来: B is incorrect: HIS envisioning of a chemisty that DAVY hoped to find 某美国大学有一门课叫"History and Philosophy of Science Since Newton",另一个网站上:‘A lively tour through six great developments in physics since Newton” 看来since 是可以得。 另外,看见了“a vision of a new cooperative America” “a vision of a new scientific publication system”,“... is a vision of a new world order that would make George Bush's head spin. It's a visionof a hemp-based economy.” 再说,既然b用了his, 未画线部分为何不用he? 16. The ninetheenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early expreiments in his "Essay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found. A. a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a B. a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a 这题主要争议集中在A和B两个选项。首先想明确一下原句的意思:"Essay on Heat and Light"既是对原有化学理论的批评又是对新理论的展望。(为了确认这点我特意用GOOGLE查了一下相关的背景知识,应该说的确是Davy而不是Boyle提出了新理论。)因此原题中的平行结构就应该是a critique of ...对a vision of ...或者his envisioning of。其次,ETS的出题原则是正确的选项应该是concise: simple but clear。不单符合语言习惯而且在结构和语言组织上要尽可能的简单。假设答案是B的话,如果把其中的also除去,与原来的B选项并没有任何语意上的不一致,这个also在这里完全是redundant。再次,接下去看his的作用。众所周知所有格是一种限定,那么在此有没有使用这种限定的必要呢?原文是“对原有化学理论的一种批评及对新理论的展望”,前后应该保持逻辑上的对称。既然B选项在前面使用得是a critique,那么在后面转而用his envisioning就显得不parallel了。第四,对since和following的比较。 since在此是明确的时间指示词表示自……以来,有延续的含意。而following是紧随着……,强调的是先后的顺序,与一段延续的时间概念仍有所区别。 因此如果要使B选项成为正确答案,仍然需要在efficiency方面有所改进,并且不能扭曲原文的含意。 以下是引用kencheng在2005-1-26 21:01:00的发言: 首先,由于原句中已经出现过两次“his”并且都是指HD,正确答案中是否会出现象楼上所说第三个“his”反而指代RB的语言现象呢?如果是的话那么又如何解决misunderstanding的问题呢? 其次,如果认为是RB的envisioning,那么本句的结构便成为a critique of A and also B,从而使逻辑会变得相当的古怪:……对RB之后的化学理论和RB对一种新化学理论的展望的批评,而这种新理论又是HD自己所希望发现的。 16-坚持A,since可以做介词啊,为啥不能接名词?只是不常用罢了,但并不代表不用啊。再说了,OG213,和这是一模一样的哦, OG11反复说过很多次,one's + 分词 一定错, sb's doing sth的用法被og批判过很多次了envisioning 完全可以用vision这个名词来替代 B不可能对,其次his也有歧义 显然,a critique和a vision是并列的,都是前面"Essay on Heat and Light"的同位语。 但我认为A更合理;B的 and also连接两个名词我读起来觉得不好,没有also会更顺一些,另外his envisioning确实不妥。 前面对A的否定,主要在vision的使用上。不过可以google到如下的句子,"Even if this were the case, I doubt that his vision of new chemistry was limited to the. alchemical theory of composition. " 显然,A中的那种用法是正确的。不知道谁能查到下面这篇文章,可能能看到原句。 The Analytic Ideal of Chemical Elements: Robert Boyle and the French Didactic Tradition of Chemistry Mi Gyung Kim a1 a1 Department of History, North Carolina State University
B. The ninetheenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early expreiments in his "Essay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found. 代词指代歧义:his--〉whose? So the first conspicuous flaw of B is ambiguity . Except for the ambiguity, if 'his' is HD's, it sounds ugly when we read 'his envisioning of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found' because he should be in place of Davy; if RB's, the logic meaning turns rediculous, 'HD's book, a book which is the resuls of his experiments, is a critique and RB's evisioning, ' 'since' is a prep, so A is correct. 第一题一位老外学生指出B的一点根本错误,我认为很有道理,大家请看过来: B is incorrect: HIS envisioning of a chemisty that DAVY hoped to find 某美国大学有一门课叫"History and Philosophy of Science Since Newton",另一个网站上:‘A lively tour through six great developments in physics since Newton” 看来since 是可以得。 另外,看见了“a vision of a new cooperative America” “a vision of a new scientific publication system”,“... is a vision of a new world order that would make George Bush's head spin. It's a visionof a hemp-based economy.” 再说,既然b用了his, 未画线部分为何不用he? 16. The ninetheenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early expreiments in his "Essay on Heat and Light", a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found. A. a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a B. a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a 这题主要争议集中在A和B两个选项。首先想明确一下原句的意思:"Essay on Heat and Light"既是对原有化学理论的批评又是对新理论的展望。(为了确认这点我特意用GOOGLE查了一下相关的背景知识,应该说的确是Davy而不是Boyle提出了新理论。)因此原题中的平行结构就应该是a critique of ...对a vision of ...或者his envisioning of。其次,ETS的出题原则是正确的选项应该是concise: simple but clear。不单符合语言习惯而且在结构和语言组织上要尽可能的简单。假设答案是B的话,如果把其中的also除去,与原来的B选项并没有任何语意上的不一致,这个also在这里完全是redundant。再次,接下去看his的作用。众所周知所有格是一种限定,那么在此有没有使用这种限定的必要呢?原文是“对原有化学理论的一种批评及对新理论的展望”,前后应该保持逻辑上的对称。既然B选项在前面使用得是a critique,那么在后面转而用his envisioning就显得不parallel了。第四,对since和following的比较。 since在此是明确的时间指示词表示自……以来,有延续的含意。而following是紧随着……,强调的是先后的顺序,与一段延续的时间概念仍有所区别。 因此如果要使B选项成为正确答案,仍然需要在efficiency方面有所改进,并且不能扭曲原文的含意。 以下是引用kencheng在2005-1-26 21:01:00的发言: 首先,由于原句中已经出现过两次“his”并且都是指HD,正确答案中是否会出现象楼上所说第三个“his”反而指代RB的语言现象呢?如果是的话那么又如何解决misunderstanding的问题呢? 其次,如果认为是RB的envisioning,那么本句的结构便成为a critique of A and also B,从而使逻辑会变得相当的古怪:……对RB之后的化学理论和RB对一种新化学理论的展望的批评,而这种新理论又是HD自己所希望发现的。 16-坚持A,since可以做介词啊,为啥不能接名词?只是不常用罢了,但并不代表不用啊。再说了,OG213,和这是一模一样的哦, OG11反复说过很多次,one's + 分词 一定错, sb's doing sth的用法被og批判过很多次了envisioning 完全可以用vision这个名词来替代 B不可能对,其次his也有歧义 显然,a critique和a vision是并列的,都是前面"Essay on Heat and Light"的同位语。 但我认为A更合理;B的 and also连接两个名词我读起来觉得不好,没有also会更顺一些,另外his envisioning确实不妥。 前面对A的否定,主要在vision的使用上。不过可以google到如下的句子,"Even if this were the case, I doubt that his vision of new chemistry was limited to the. alchemical theory of composition. " 显然,A中的那种用法是正确的。不知道谁能查到下面这篇文章,可能能看到原句。 The Analytic Ideal of Chemical Elements: Robert Boyle and the French Didactic Tradition of Chemistry Mi Gyung Kim a1 a1 Department of History, North Carolina State University
|