- UID
- 179949
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2006-9-2
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
OG 11th- 67
67. Defense attorneys have occassionally argued that their client's misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but "in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy", the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
B) if cirminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
C) in attributing be havior that is cirminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of cirminal or delinquent behavior
Answer: B
Logical predication + Idiom
The oroginal sentence contains an incorrect idiom and a misplanced modifier. The correct idiom in the active voice is one attributes x (an effect) to y (a cause). In the passive voice, x (an effect) is attributed to y (the cause). The modifying phrase (in attributing...) incorrectly descirbes perpetrators when it should describe defense attorneys. ........
想请问的是
解释说明 (in attributing...) incorrectly descirbes perpetrators when it should describe defense attorneys.
是如何判断 attributing 是在修饰perpetrators呢？
谢谢
|
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2007-5-4 13:38:00
楼主
