ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2206|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

xdf 补充250

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-11-6 10:02:00 | 只看该作者

xdf 补充250

1.open in 1683 the asnolean was the first public museum in great Britain, (while earlier the bodleian has been the first truly public library.)
(1)just as earlier the bodleian had been
(2)as the earlier bodleian has been
选(1),如果(2)改为as the earlier bodleian had been可否?

2.( plausible though it sounds, the weakness of the hypothesis) is that it does not incorporate all relevant evidence. .
(1)though the hypothesis sounds plausible, it’s weakness.
(2)The weakness of the hypothesis which sounds plausible.
选(1),(2)为什么不行?

沙发
发表于 2003-11-7 00:20:00 | 只看该作者
1
改为as the earlier bodleian had been不可以。因为earlier本来是作状语的,现在变成了bodleian的定语。


2
从逻辑意思上说,由(1)表达的转折关系比(2)表达的修饰关系要好。
WHICH改为THAT也更好一些。
WHICH从句有修饰weakness的嫌疑。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 10:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部