发一片作文，请大家多多拍砖～！！

topic是 should higher education be available to all students or only to good students?

我自己感觉一般，希望大家给批改一下！！！！！！！！谢了！！！！！

Living in such an era when incredible developments are taking place ceaselessly, Chinese people have gradually come to realize the significance of getting higher education. In the mean time, the educational reform in this venerable country these years has granted a remarkable population the opportunity of entering universities. Naturally, this phenomenon provokes the intense controversy of whether all students, no matter how well they do in academic field, should be allowed into universities. Personally, I tend to believe that, only good students, instead of students in all levels, should be admitted to universities, and I will explore several reasons as follow.
 
One primary cause is that only good students, in most cases, virtually concern about their study. Students who are qualified to enter universities and further their education often do pretty well in their high school and have mostly fully prepare to get more detailed and specific education in the universities. Meanwhile, their purposes of going to university are to lay a solid foundation for their future career, to pursue their dreams and also, to realize their unlimited potential. In contrast, poor students tend to be lazy and unmotivated; instead of focusing their time on study, their often prefer to cozy but aimless life. In between the option of staying in laboratories or library doing research and getting immersed into computer games or cyber life online, they are more likely to pick the latter. This means that the existence of poor students in universities would bring no benefits but only have a negative influence on those excellent ones.

It is also obvious to notice that if universities were available to all students, they would definitely overload almost in no time, and what follows as the consequence is the decline of the educational quality. Poor students will occupy part of the invaluable teaching resources such as teachers, classrooms as well as other hardware facilities but not make good use them; on the other hand, prominent students will acquire comparatively less resources to utilize. For instant, they may desperately find the courses they want to take have been crowded with too many people. Furthermore, they may fail to get access to useful information on the internet with the school's network service as countless users are making it overloaded. What even worse is that some good students might be affected by those poor and get degenerated in the campus!

Undoubtedly, everyone should be given the right to receive higher education, but it doesn't absolutely points that universities should be accessible to all of them as we have seen so many drawbacks doing so. And for a student failed in his/her previous education really want to go to the university, I think maybe s/he should first return to high school and make up those courses failed.

LS说到要做到啊～～～期待你的评价～！！！

总统感觉内容有点重复，而且有点乱。基本每段先说好学生的情况后边接的是坏学生的情况，形成了强烈的对比，好像前边在说GOOD，而后边在一直再说NOT GOOD，所以读后边读到的信息量很少，给我的感觉就是有点凑字数。

这篇文章建议从以下方面考虑：1）是不是所有的学生都具备上大学的条件?

2)学生上大学的动机及其对待  3）假如条件是都上大学的话会有什么后果？

简易提纲：第一段可以简易说明上述三方面的概括，给出自己的观点。

          第二段从第一方面来说，对于好学生来说，上大学是非常重要的，因为……(占大部分字符说明)。而成绩差的学生由于种种原因（贪玩，基础差）导致他们还不具备一定的基础，如果他们重新打好基础，提高成绩，也是有机会进入大学的。

          第三段从第二方面入手，好学生的动机广泛教育，吸收更多知识，态度当然坚定，而且认真（占大部分字符）。如果所有人都上大学的话，肯定有人会为了一纸毕业证等等，失去了意义。

          第四段从三方面说。

          第五段就是总结一下。

PS：All-Good = Poor? 不敢苟同。当然有的地方可以用Poor。

    强烈建议从正面说明吸收好学生的重要性。段落结尾可以点缀一些poor的坏处。

    不是LS，只是给些建议罢了！~~