以下是引用stoneren在2004-7-22 7:34:00的发言:
偶没有找到上述四个OG是有逗号作定语的。
不可能的 你再读一下OG的解释 以下是我的总结
在句中、句末,修饰的是就近名词,在句末,也要当心逻辑主语是否合适
127(a) for their employers’ paychecks, assigned by them ,assigned修饰paychecks,歪曲原意
类似地,139(a),176,247(a)
127. In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees’ paychecks, assigned by them to the United Nations.
(A) for their employees’ paychecks, assigned by them
(B) for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned
(C) for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned
(D) in place of their employees’ paychecks, for those of them assigned(B)
(E) in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them
In choice A, the phrase assigned by them modifies the adjacent noun, paychecks: the sentence implies that paychecks, rather than employees, work at the United Nations. (修饰错误,导致句意改变) In C, the phrase having been assigned... is uncertain in reference, making the sentence unclear. (动词发起者不清,使句意不清) By using in place of instead of for, choices D and E create the unidiomatic and redundant construction substitutes x in place of y. (错误用法)Moreover, D, aside from being wordy, is unclear because the pronoun them has no unambiguous antecedent; (代词指代不清+繁冗)and in E, their employees to have been assigned by them is wordy and awkward. (繁冗)Choice B, the best answer, properly uses the phrase who have been assigned... to the United Nations to modify employees.正确的选项:简洁准确清晰
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-22 8:21:52编辑过] |