ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3693|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]大全569

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-22 04:32:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]大全569

569. Our rate of teenage pregnancies is among the highest in the industrialized world, being exceeded only by Chile, Hungary, Romania, Cuba, and Bulgaria.


(A) is among the highest in the industrialized world, being exceeded only by


(B) is among the highest in the industrialized world, exceeded only by that of


(C) are among the highest in the industrialized world, only exceeded by


(D) is among the highest in the industrialized world, and exceeds onlyB


(E) are among the highest in the industrialized world, and they exceed those of only



B 中exceeded 是否有修饰 world 的嫌疑呀? 如何判断分词到底是修饰谁呢?

沙发
发表于 2004-7-22 06:15:00 | 只看该作者
exceeded过分作状语修饰主句,逻辑主语是rate of teenage pregnancies
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-22 06:19:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用stoneren在2004-7-22 6:15:00的发言:
exceeded过分作状语修饰主句,逻辑主语是rate of teenage pregnancies


非常感谢! 再问: 但是什么时候是修饰WORLD呢?有明显的标致吗, 还是要根据意思来判断?
地板
发表于 2004-7-22 06:39:00 | 只看该作者
分词作状语还是定语一般的确是从句意上来区分,但是在句首和有逗号句尾的分词结构通常都是作状语的,在名词后没有逗号的分词结构中作定语的比较多,但也不乏作状语的。
5#
发表于 2004-7-22 06:53:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用stoneren在2004-7-22 6:39:00的发言:
分词作状语还是定语一般的确是从句意上来区分,但是在句首和有逗号句尾的分词结构通常都是作状语的,在名词后没有逗号的分词结构中作定语的比较多,但也不乏作状语的。


这个如何判断啊


真是头疼


从OG的127/139/176/247 来看 全是修饰前面的名词 哪怕前面有逗号 作定语


过去分词也可作状语 大多数放在句子前部 少数放在句子后面的


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-22 6:58:22编辑过]
6#
发表于 2004-7-22 07:34:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用paopao在2004-7-22 6:53:00的发言:



这个如何判断啊


真是头疼


从OG的127/139/176/247 来看 全是修饰前面的名词 哪怕前面有逗号 作定语


过去分词也可作状语 大多数放在句子前部 少数放在句子后面的




偶没有找到上述四个OG是有逗号作定语的。
7#
发表于 2004-7-22 08:14:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用stoneren在2004-7-22 7:34:00的发言:


偶没有找到上述四个OG是有逗号作定语的。

不可能的 你再读一下OG的解释 以下是我的总结

在句中、句末,修饰的是就近名词,在句末,也要当心逻辑主语是否合适



127(a) for their employers paychecks, assigned by them ,assigned修饰paychecks,歪曲原意



类似地,139(a),176,247(a)



127. In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees’ paychecks, assigned by them to the United Nations.


(A) for their employees’ paychecks, assigned by them


(B) for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned


(C) for the paychecks of their employees, having been assigned


(D) in place of their employees’ paychecks, for those of them assignedB


(E) in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them


In choice A, the phrase assigned by them modifies the adjacent noun, paychecks: the sentence implies that paychecks, rather than employees, work at the United Nations. (修饰错误,导致句意改变) In C, the phrase having been assigned... is uncertain in reference, making the sentence unclear. (动词发起者不清,使句意不清) By using in place of instead of for, choices D and E create the unidiomatic and redundant construction substitutes x in place of y. (错误用法)Moreover, D, aside from being wordy, is unclear because the pronoun them has no unambiguous antecedent; (代词指代不清+繁冗)and in E, their employees to have been assigned by them is wordy and awkward. (繁冗)Choice B, the best answer, properly uses the phrase who have been assigned... to the United Nations to modify employees.正确的选项:简洁准确清晰




[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-22 8:21:52编辑过]
8#
发表于 2004-7-22 08:46:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢,我只看了正确答案,忽略了错误选项。127A的确是有逗号作定语;不过139A中的revealed是谓语动词,guided是没逗号作定语;176中founded是没逗号作定语;247是作状语的而不是定语,虽然其逻辑主语是主句主语。

看来的确是作定语还是作状语要逻辑判断。

谢谢paopao

9#
发表于 2004-7-22 09:29:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用stoneren在2004-7-22 8:46:00的发言:

247是作状语的而不是定语,虽然其逻辑主语是主句主语。


247. Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city's mayor proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.


黑体部分作的是定语 修饰的是amount


我感觉这些都可以根据句意判断 真正的问题是如何判断有歧义啊 还是跟我原来的without 的问题一样


在同样的情况 名词+逗号+过去分词 如何判断何时会有歧义


我是一碰见这种题就死啊 ETS翻手为云 覆手为雨 有时说有歧义 有时又不说歧义 我感觉头痛死了


stoneren 你有什么好办法吗


谢谢


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-22 9:39:29编辑过]
10#
发表于 2004-7-22 09:47:00 | 只看该作者
我在4楼的帖子说的就是我做题的思路,这里我再具体化一下:1-分词短语是个孤立的短语,也即A短语在句首时后面有逗号,B短语在句中前后有逗号,C短语在句尾,前面有逗号,我都先把短语看成状语,修饰句子,讲不通的,再看是否可能是定语,但是,这种情况下,绝大多数都是作状语的;当然,这里有一种例外,那就是-单独的名词结构+逗号+分词结构,这时,分词一般只能作定语;2-分词短语没有逗号紧跟名词结构的,我一般把此结构看成定语。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-6 06:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部