ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1261|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd31-12-39

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-5-30 17:02:00 | 只看该作者

gwd31-12-39

Q39:

Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride.

 

A.     Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

B.     Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, they cost less,

C.     Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with most sport utility vehicles, and have a lower cost, they

D.     Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

E.      Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles the cost is lower, and they

   Answer: D

可A错在哪里呢,难道是多了一个and吗

沙发
发表于 2006-5-30 19:43:00 | 只看该作者

我认为句子重心问题,carry passenger明显应该做定语修饰minivans,而不应该和主句
并列,如果不说意思,只讲语法,它没错。

板凳
发表于 2006-5-30 20:23:00 | 只看该作者
“compare with”是“夹心面包”结构,既可修饰前面的carry,有可修饰后面的cost,引起歧义。体会一下。
地板
发表于 2006-12-29 15:28:00 | 只看该作者

"compared with"应该不能修饰前面的carry吧,因为中间有and分开,而且suv也可载7人。

我认为选A更好.D中"carrying as many as seven passengers"和"compared with most sport utility vehicles"前后两个分词结构修饰minivan不好。记得OG和大全里有一两个这样的选项都不是正确选项,好像其中一个的解释是后一个分词结构可被误解为修饰前一个分词结构最后的一个名词。

5#
发表于 2006-12-29 18:38:00 | 只看该作者
A错在并列结构的第一个AND,他使得CARRY和后面的动词并列,但最后一句还有一个AND。所以错误,D用CARRY的分词结构解决了这个问题
6#
发表于 2006-12-29 21:00:00 | 只看该作者

carry和后面的动词并列应该不是一个错误。但为何后面要加一个and(标红)呢?我认为是为了和后面的几个动词分开。因为后几个动词表达的意义有一个前提就是compared with most suv,而carry as many as seven passengers是不需要这个前提的,大部分suv都可载7人,如果加上这个前提反而逻辑错了。因此第一个and不但没错,还是不可缺的。

Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride.

7#
发表于 2006-12-29 22:47:00 | 只看该作者

选A语意上有问题 这句话比较的是 minivans在乘载7个人的时候 与其他的交通工具进行比较 花费少等等好处 A不是这个意思 只是拿minivans和其他的车进行比较 失去意义 

请指正 open to discussion~

8#
发表于 2006-12-29 22:55:00 | 只看该作者

A要对,应该把compare和carry的位置换一下,然后把and去掉吧~总之改了好像也有问题~

这个觉得compared夹在中间,不知道是修饰前面还是修饰后面~有歧义~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-12 15:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部