ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3301|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG109

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-2-28 11:46:00 | 只看该作者

OG109

Legislation in the Canadian province of' Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for Jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men. fficeffice" />


(A) that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are


(B) that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills


(C) to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs or comparable skill that are


(D) to pay the same regardless or whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills


(E) to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills


.Choice A is best. In choice B,should is illogical after requires or at least unnecessary


I have the following two questions


(1) ETS's explaination: why "should" is illogical?


(2) "that" in    choice A 做什么成分?是引导宾语从句么? 真正的主语是 “Pay”


thanks


    

沙发
发表于 2004-2-28 12:22:00 | 只看该作者

(1) ETS's explaination: why "should" is illogical? ----->>> just remember it! the rule applies to any subjunctive mood








(2) "that" in    choice A 做什么成分?是引导宾语从句么?---> yes, here 'that' can not be ommitted

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-2-29 10:30:00 | 只看该作者
thanks, snazzy
地板
发表于 2004-3-15 21:59:00 | 只看该作者
请問 OG说(C)(D)(E):require of ... employers to pay, in which "of" makes the phrase incorrect         这of错在哪?? thanks
5#
发表于 2004-3-15 22:39:00 | 只看该作者
6#
发表于 2006-7-25 17:05:00 | 只看该作者

关于分词和定语从句的修饰:

从此题中可以看出分词一般是就近原则,而从句则不是,联系OG85,86可以看出,定于从句修饰的原则是不出现歧义。

7#
发表于 2006-12-28 10:39:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-21 09:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部