ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the greatest price the market will bear when they have such a product. But large profits on the new product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the new product's capabilities. Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1474|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD1-3 BF 重新发贴讨论 更改答案

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-10-12 22:11:00 | 只看该作者

GWD1-3 BF 重新发贴讨论 更改答案

GWD-1-Q3: Boldface

A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the greatest price the market will bear when they have such a product.  But large profits on the mew product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the mew product’s capabilities.  Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

 

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

 

  1. The first is an assumption that forms the basis for a course of action that the argument criticizes; the second presents the course of action endorsed by the argument.

  2. The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the wisdom of adopting that strategy.

  3. The first is an assumption that has been used to justify a certain strategy; the second is a consideration that is used to cast doubt on that assumption.

  4. The first is a consideration raised in support of a strategy the argument endorses; the second presents grounds in support of that consideration.

  5. The first is a consideration raised to show that adopting a certain strategy is unlikely to achieve the intended effect; the second is presented to explain the appeal of that strategy.[D]*B

觉得答案应该是D,B中的appeal觉得应该理解为吸引力,后面的call into question也是不对的,but后面只是陈述了一个事实,它支持高科技很快就会被超过。觉得D合适

 

沙发
发表于 2006-10-13 08:55:00 | 只看该作者

个人支持B

文章以But为界,分为两块。

第一块是charge the greatest price

第二块是charge less than the greatest possible price.

第二块与第一块的观点不同。所以用了call into question

 But large profits on the mew product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the mew product’s capabilities.(原因)
            
Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.(结果)

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-13 10:30:00 | 只看该作者

 Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed(原因1) and companies want to make large profits while they still can(原因2), many companies charge the greatest price the market will bear when they have such a product.(采用该strategy)  But large profits on the mew product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the mew product’s capabilities.(这个strategy的效果+but,语气是质疑) 

再好好想想,觉得D的前半句好像是对的,错的话在后半句,后半句说的是这个strategy会带来的效果,与strategy的原因是没有关系的,谢谢斑斑提示~~

还要麻烦斑斑把帖子转去逻辑区,昨天发错了

还要麻烦斑斑把帖子转去逻辑区,昨天发错了

地板
发表于 2006-10-13 11:09:00 | 只看该作者

是滴是滴

but是转折的语气意味着不同的观点要出现了。。。。。

这个贴要麻烦语法区的斑斑转一下了。。。。。。。。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 17:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部