GMAT高分并不增加被录取的几率

刚才看了wharton 一个录取委员的评论，他说V/M在80%/80%以上就可以，这样就能跟得上wharton的课程。

看来大家不要过于强调GMAT。关键还是要看你以前的work experience和学校牌子，GPA等。这个结论从kellog的录取结果也可以看出来。

Here's an interesting case from Kellogg's 2004 entering class i saw somewhere. This is a good GMAT question possibility

If 5282 applied to the 2-year MBA class resulting in 469, what percentage of students were admitted with the various GMAT brackets of scores of 200-640, 650-690, 700-740, 750-800? When you do the math (Taking into account that Kellogg admits 12% more than needed for instances where the applicant chooses another school), you get the following: 640 or less GMAT = 1056 apps with 42 accepted at 4% acceptance. 650-690 GMAT = 1584 apps with 158 accepted at 10% acceptance. 700-740 GMAT = 2059 apps with 252 accepted at 12.2% acceptance. 750-780 GMAT = 581 apps with 74 accepted at 12.7% acceptance. That means the 2004 class had 25% of all students who scored 700 or more accepted. However, the actual student population is actually 62% people who scored 700 or more. This is actually a great challenge and encouragement as one thought it would be much worse. So 38% of the class scored 690 or less? That's cool. 700-740 is only 2% more likely to receive acceptance than those who had 650-690. Not much of a difference. I think this is why we ought not to kill ourselves for not getting 700 and for not killing our self if we do get 700 or more and don't get into a top Business  School. That 2% can't hurt though. And we havent yet started talking about 750+ !

Verbal 80% 对中国学生来说不是非常容易的。

其他因素差不多得时候, GMAT高分自然就有用了

而中国学生得背景往往都差不多, 大牛很少,所以G对CHINESE还有点用

gmat高分被录取的几率肯定是高，因为这些考高分的人学术背景和工作经历等更方面也都很强。

我想说的是，如果你学术背景和工作经历等更方面很强，而GMAT一般，就没有必要重新考gmat了。

G的分数和什么学术背景, 工作经历没有任何关系

英语过了六级的, 全日制搞个两个月, GMAT都有很大的可能性过750

所以工作越清闲的, 反而分数可能越高