ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2338|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全351

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-10-28 14:03:00 | 只看该作者

请教大全351

1.        In 1929 relatively small declines in the market ruined many speculators having bought on margin; they had to sell, and their selling pushed other investors to the brink.


(A) speculators having bought on margin; they had to sell, and


(B) speculators who had bought on margin; having had to sell,


(C) speculators who had bought on margin; they had to sell, and


(D) speculators, those who had bought on margin; these speculators had to sell, andC


(E) speculators, who, having bought on margin and having to sell


A和C的主要区别是A用了分词,而C用了不定式,是否因为分词强调重复性动作,而从句强调一次性动作,故A不正确

沙发
发表于 2004-10-28 14:25:00 | 只看该作者

我认为A选项的结构有问题,因为省略引导词,导致了两个谓语结构。不知道对不对?!

板凳
发表于 2004-10-28 19:11:00 | 只看该作者
意思一致的情况下,动名词的修饰更多伴随的意味,就是说一直怎样,这是需要区分究竟是一个伴随的动作还是一个状态.本句应该是说一种怎样的人,是当时的情况,用了动名词意思不太好,我的理解~~~~~
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-11-4 16:51:00 | 只看该作者
同意oceanegaoMM的说法
5#
发表于 2005-12-7 13:59:00 | 只看该作者
有位大N对于后句的分词结构做伴随做了精辟的分析,楼上可以在CD搜索。大致意思是,后句表示伴随在GMAT考试中,只考两种:A,前句整句导致后句的发生。B,后句动词和前句动词同时发生。本人就通过这点直接排除A,B,C,不知对否
6#
发表于 2005-12-7 14:01:00 | 只看该作者
不好意思,搞错了,没有仔细看句子,以为是352
7#
发表于 2008-6-28 11:30:00 | 只看该作者
OG中的解釋是:
Choice A can be faulted because having bought on margin does not precisely establish a sequence of events

可是如果"having bought on margin"不能顯示發生的先後, 那麼"having bought on margin"跟"buying on margin"豈不是一様嗎???
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-18 03:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部