ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1376|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep1-132 新疑问

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-5-17 09:11:00 | 只看该作者

prep1-132 新疑问

132. (31556-!-item-!-188;#058&004545)
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay
than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.
(A) that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a
ratio of 42 times
(B) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that
compares to 42 times
(C) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42
times their pay, the ratio
(D) CEO's who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to
42 times their pay, the ratio
(E) CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the
ratio of 42 times

答案是C, 疑问是对B项的解释: compare to的比较对象不对等,前者419 times the pay of
blue-collar workers表达的是工资数,而后者42 times是比率。

a ratio 不是指代前面的419 times吗, 这样, 419 times compared to 42 times 没有错啊~

按解释理解, a ratio成指代419 times the pay of blue-collar workers了

 

沙发
发表于 2009-5-17 10:52:00 | 只看该作者
a ratio指的是419 times the pay of blue-collar workers.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-17 22:50:00 | 只看该作者
ratio不是比率吗, 怎么能指419 times the pay of blue-collar workers.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-17 23:01:00 | 只看该作者

这题是GWD1-Q7原题, 但是GWD上面讨论的答案是B,

5#
发表于 2009-5-19 05:02:00 | 只看该作者
B的明显问题是compare没有用被动
6#
发表于 2009-5-19 05:11:00 | 只看该作者
7#
发表于 2009-10-8 22:16:00 | 只看该作者

(B) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that
compares to 42 times

ratio是比例,419倍和42倍都是比例。

a ratio在这里是同位于解释前面的419倍,但是它不能同时又是42倍,一个比例只能是一个确定的数值,所以B逻辑错。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-22 20:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部