ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (LMPX)

00:00:00

Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that the defendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2262|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全补充-37

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-22 10:44:00 | 只看该作者

大全补充-37

37.   Seeming to be the only organization fighting for the rights of poor people in the South, Hosea Hudson, a laborer in Alabama, joined the Communist party in 1931.

(A) Seeming to be

(B) As

(C) In that they seemed

(D) Since it seemedE

(E) Because it seemed to be

请问一下大家b选项。as在这里为什么不对呢?

as总是搞不清楚。我现在感觉as的出题点有以下几个:

1 as和like的比较句型 as后面接句子, like后面跟名词

2 as引导原因状语从句

3 as和动词相接比如:operate X as Y

在这道题里不可以当作作为讲吗,还是说逻辑指代一定要指主语?谢谢大家

沙发
发表于 2006-7-22 10:50:00 | 只看该作者

好象没那么复杂

把AS带进去,作为整个句子理解, AS 接名词, 必须和后面的的逻辑主语一致,  Hosea Hudson是个人,怎么能作个the only organization fighting...,

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-22 11:03:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢jessibetty

我还想请问一下as地用法是只有这些吗?

地板
发表于 2006-7-22 11:34:00 | 只看该作者
印象中OG里就这些,再看到再告诉你哈
5#
发表于 2006-7-22 11:37:00 | 只看该作者

郁闷我也错了

补充一下,superficial 那个,og 上的,as 指代前面一整句话

说说seem 的用法吧?

6#
发表于 2006-7-22 12:55:00 | 只看该作者
7#
发表于 2006-7-22 13:01:00 | 只看该作者

关于As的用法总结,请大家参考刘振明的语法第10章。我也是刚刚翻的

如果没有去这里下载:http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=81499&page=1

还有,建议MM去看看http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=48608

不知道大家注意到没有,这道题的特点是:从句中的代词it不是指代主句中的主语。

原来我认为从句中的代词一定指代主句的主语。看了这道题后,才知道应该将一定改为优先:修正后的规则为从句中的代词优先指代主句的主语。这个例子是所有大全里面唯一一个从句代词不是指代主语的。(可能我记忆力有限,大家如果看到其他的麻烦补充)

当时我做这题的时候觉得没一个答案对,特别郁闷,所以印象深刻

8#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-22 13:50:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用littledou在2006-7-22 13:01:00的发言:

关于As的用法总结,请大家参考刘振明的语法第10章。我也是刚刚翻的

如果没有去这里下载:http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=23&ID=81499&page=1

还有,建议MM去看看http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=48608

不知道大家注意到没有,这道题的特点是:从句中的代词it不是指代主句中的主语。

原来我认为从句中的代词一定指代主句的主语。看了这道题后,才知道应该将一定改为优先:修正后的规则为从句中的代词优先指代主句的主语。这个例子是所有大全里面唯一一个从句代词不是指代主语的。(可能我记忆力有限,大家如果看到其他的麻烦补充)

当时我做这题的时候觉得没一个答案对,特别郁闷,所以印象深刻

同感同感,这道题的代词指代真是让人印象太深刻了。

9#
发表于 2006-8-4 18:01:00 | 只看该作者

227.  Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that the defendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.
        

(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut
        

(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they(语法上优先指代identities,但是逻辑上只能是人,所以往后找,找到宾语defendants,既是.) can attempt to rebut
        

(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a rebuttal of
        

(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt rebuttingB
        

(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut
        

In English the subjunctive mood is used to express a wish or requirement that a certain course of action be taken. Such phrasing takes the form to wish [or] require that x be y, not that x should be y or that x is y. Choice B, therefore, is best. In place of the subjunctive, A uses the indicative are and E uses an awkward gerund, making, while C and D contain the unnecessary should. A and C also omit that after so, and D omits that after require. The phrase attempt to rebut is more idiomatic than the phrases that replace it in C and D. Choices C and E awkwardly place the plural noun witnesses between the plural pronoun they and its referent, defendants.
        

这题是真正不是指代主语的

GEMJ评论:

GEMJ的解释
                    
B选项中的they的指代不是完美清晰的。凡是不符合优先指代规则的情况都会出现这样的问题。
但不能说这种情况就是指代不清了,因为这个选项从逻辑的角度看,其中they是不可能指代identities的,只能指代人从逻辑的角度能够清晰地判断其指代对象。
更不能说这就是错误的,毕竟“优先指代”是“优先”,不是永远。
或者说违背“优先指代”规则的选项有可能是正确的选项。
毕竟,世界上没有完美无缺的语言。
或者以安哥的话来说,这只是EFFECTIVENESS的问题,而非CORRECTIVENESS

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 00:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部