ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1625|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG10-18

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-3-19 12:10:00 | 只看该作者

OG10-18

18. Each of Hemingway's wives--Hadley Richardson. Pauline Pfeiffer. Martha Gelhom. and Mary Welsh --were strong and interesting women, very different from the often pallid women who populate his novels.

(A) Each of Hemingway's wives--Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--were strong and interest­ing women,

(B) Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhorn, and Mary Welsh--each of them Hemingway's wives--were strong and, interesting women,

(C) Hemingway's wives--Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--were all strong and interesting women,

(D) Strong and interesting women—Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--each a wife of Hemingway, was

(E) Strong and interesting women—Hadley Richardson, Pauline Pfeiffer, Martha Gelhom, and Mary Welsh--every one of Hemingway's wives were

答案C没问题

问题1

In B, the subject and verb agree, but the descriptive phrase placed between them creates an illogical statement because each cannot be wives; each can be one of the wives, or a wife 应该怎么理解?我觉得我没理解og的意思!如何illogical

each of them Hemingway's wives 的正确形式是什么?

改成 each of Hemingway's wives ;

还是改成each of them Hemingway's wife,后者总感觉怪怪的

问题2

(D) Strong and interesting women—xxx--each a wife of Hemingway, was

主语是women,所以was错
                

(E) Strong and interesting women—xxx--every one of Hemingway's wives were

按照og的说法,D中主语应当是every one ,那么Strong and interesting women在句中做什么成份?

望NN指点!3X

 

沙发
发表于 2008-3-19 15:51:00 | 只看该作者

不是NN,刚好看到这道题

1.我觉得OG的意思是说,each是表单数意义的词(要么表示几个wife中的一个,要么表示单个的一个wife),不能和复数名词wives连用。其实,看到这些人共有的共性(即都是H的老婆),就知道应该用all了;

2.E-Strong and interesting women同位语修饰every one,而D则是each a wife..修饰那堆人名。        

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-19 19:26:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢ricee

1.你的意思是把each of them Hemingway's wives 改为all of them Hemingway's wives 还是all of Hemingway's wives

each of them Hemingway's wives 能否改成 each of Hemingway's wives 或是each of them Hemingway's wife,如果后面是was

2.E 要是主语同为语的话,是否应该为 n, S V O ?

  如果把插入语拿掉,这里就成Strong and interesting women every one of Hemingway's wives were

 n S V..,此时能看成同位语吗?

地板
发表于 2008-3-20 10:50:00 | 只看该作者

个人感觉all of them Hemingway's wives是可以的,但是B后面的strong and, interesting women,是无论如何都不对的。

而至于破折号,和我们用的括号应该差不多,而这里又有插入语,又有同位语,所以结构是混乱的,远不如C来的清晰。

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-20 12:46:00 | 只看该作者

我还是有点晕

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-21 10:23:00 | 只看该作者

UP

all of them Hemingway's wives

all of Hemingway's wives

哪个正确,有什么区别?

Strong and interesting women—xxx--every one of Hemingway's wives were

是同位语吗?

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-22 20:34:00 | 只看该作者
UP
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-3-23 21:47:00 | 只看该作者
ding
9#
发表于 2014-11-13 22:06:08 | 只看该作者
我也不明白B的解释。

each of them, each of students, of的后面接的不都是复数词吗,each of wives 跟 each one of the wives有什么区别??
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 21:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部