ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1640|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-10-23 不是重复发问,以查

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-30 18:11:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-10-23 不是重复发问,以查

GWD-10-Q23

For the first time in the modern era, non-Hispanic Whites are officially a minority in California, which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly there-quarters only a decade ago.

 

  1. which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters only a decade ago

  2. which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from a decade ago, when it was nearly three-quarters

  3. and that amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from a decade ago, when they were nearly three-quarters

  4. amounting to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters a decade ago

  5. amounting to a little less than half the population of the state, down from what it was a decade ago by nearly three-quarters
b,c 中黄色部分是否都是修饰不清楚??? 特别是down from a decade ago,  可以修饰state, 也可以修饰when 从句。
it 则是指代不明确的

谢谢大家
沙发
发表于 2006-7-30 18:51:00 | 只看该作者

B、C两个答案都是错的,介词短语down from a decade ago不能处于两重句之间,也不能处于完整的句子和重句之间,ambiguous。

B答案的it确实有指代不明确的问题,而且读起来显得非常拗口,呵呵,awkward

C答案最重要的错误,就是and that amounts to a little less than half the population of the state导致and前的那个句子没有谓语了,比介词短语down from a decade ago的ambiguous错得更严重。

 

板凳
发表于 2006-7-30 18:53:00 | 只看该作者

C答案最重要的错误,就是and that amounts to a little less than half the population of the state导致and前的那个句子没有谓语了,比介词短语down from a decade ago的ambiguous错得更严重。

好像不是的,谓语还是有的,就是不能平行而已

C的they也不对,逻辑不对


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-30 19:06:56编辑过]
地板
发表于 2006-7-30 22:00:00 | 只看该作者

the emphasis on the solution to this problem is "which amounts" or " amounting"...the given two expressions do have difference.

"Which" refers umbiguously,while amounting is pretty consice and clear.

5#
发表于 2006-7-30 22:29:00 | 只看该作者
这是典型的"前面一段话对后面的影响"题型which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state从句是错误答案的标志,偶刚复习完这个.应该用分词,答案是D吧
6#
发表于 2006-7-30 22:31:00 | 只看该作者
刚才没仔细看,补充一点E中的it前面有太多的单数名词,会有指代歧义,应该是D
7#
发表于 2006-7-30 22:47:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用mymengming在2006-7-30 18:53:00的发言:

C答案最重要的错误,就是and that amounts to a little less than half the population of the state导致and前的那个句子没有谓语了,比介词短语down from a decade ago的ambiguous错得更严重。

好像不是的,谓语还是有的,就是不能平行而已

C的they也不对,逻辑不对


mymengming说得对哈,谢谢指正!blame自己一个~~

答案我也赞成D,分词的逻辑主语和句子主语统一,准确而简洁,是最好的答案

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 19:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部