ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1211|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全 23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-8-21 20:58:00 | 只看该作者

请教大全 23

       A recent New York Times editorial criticized the city’s election board for, first of all, failing to replace outmoded voting machines prone to breakdowns, and secondarily, for their failure to investigate allegations of corruption involving board members.

(A) secondarily, for their failure to

(B) secondly, for their failure to

(C) secondly, that they failed and did not

(D) second, that they failed to

(E) second, for failing to

答案e

我觉得前面说的是for, first of all,后面就该接 sencondly,就不应该有for,认为d可以

请指教!

谢谢:)

沙发
发表于 2006-8-22 10:52:00 | 只看该作者

first, second, third.

that's how we count.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-8-22 19:36:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用mbz在2006-8-22 10:52:00的发言:

first, second, third.

that's how we count.

这个明白,谢谢:)我是想知道for的位置,因为觉得答案造成了不平衡,不知道该怎样理解,请教,谢谢:)


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-22 19:37:29编辑过]
地板
发表于 2006-8-22 22:07:00 | 只看该作者

I think E is very reasonable. Absolutely parallel here is not good.

"xxx for, first of all,xxxx, for, second, xxxx"

You can simply accept E as the way Laowai use.

5#
发表于 2006-8-23 05:29:00 | 只看该作者
"the city’s election board" is singular, that is why ABCD are all out.

Second = Secondly  (see http://m-w.com/dictionary/secondly )
6#
发表于 2006-8-23 06:38:00 | 只看该作者
E
7#
发表于 2006-8-23 11:22:00 | 只看该作者
这种作为插入语的修饰短语的结构好像不一定要整体平行的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-19 17:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部