请教：分词与从句修饰的区别？补充题27

cxj · 发表于 2003-11-26 12:05:00

27. In 1929 relatively small declines in the market ruined many speculators having bought on margin; they had to sell, and their selling pushed other investors to the brink.
(A) speculators having bought on margin; they had to sell, and
(B) speculators who had bought on margin; having had to sell,
(C) speculators who had bought on margin; they had to sell, and
(D) speculators, those who had bought on margin; these speculators had to sell, and
(E) speculators, who, having bought on margin and having to sell,

dreadpower · 发表于 2003-11-26 20:57:00

这里不是分词和从句的区别问题，而是分词的完成式绝对不能修饰名词（A错）

其他的不用说了吧

stella131 · 发表于 2003-11-26 21:23:00

分词表示多次，重复性动作，没有时间概念
从句表示一次性动作，有时间概念。

请问nn，是这样得吗？

gracehu · 发表于 2003-11-27 08:21:00

确认一下哪个是答案啊

dreadpower · 发表于 2003-11-27 08:28:00

gracehu · 发表于 2003-11-29 07:33:00

THX!

motorola00 · 发表于 2003-12-20 16:49:00

我还是不明白，sty having bought margin 和 sth who had bought margin 到底有什么区别啊？？

dreadpower · 发表于 2003-12-20 22:29:00

就是一个规则：分词的完成式（having bought ）绝对不能修饰名词

记住就行，非常好用

hpp920 · 发表于 2004-7-18 09:32:00

楼上的高手说的很对啦, 分词的完成式通常是用来做状语的,绝对不能修饰名词, 我的语法书上这么说的.

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-18 11:21:02编辑过]

victorliao · 发表于 2004-9-22 16:27:00

"分词的完成式通常是用来做状语的,绝对不能修饰名词, 我的语法书上这么说的."

我今天才知道这个语法点，请问NN用的是哪一本语法书？张道真的９５版的Page338介绍了分词的完成式通常是用来做状语的，但没说不能修饰名词，我还想多了解有关它的用法，能否指点一下？

谢谢！

请教：分词与从句修饰的区别？补充题27