ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1974|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd5-1和gwd3-10两道so...that...题,请NN们指教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-9-4 12:38:00 | 只看该作者

gwd5-1和gwd3-10两道so...that...题,请NN们指教






gwd5-1:


So dogged were Frances Perkins’ investigations of the garment industry, and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt recruited Perkins to work within the government, rather than as a social worker.and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent,



  • and her lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent,

  • and lobbying for wage and hour reform was persistent, so that

  • her lobbying for wage and hour reform persistent, that

  • lobbying for wage and hour reform was so persistent,

  • so persistent her lobbying for wage and hour reform, that

  • LACE>gwd3-10LACE>


    LACE>LACE>LACE>AntarcticaLACE> receives more solar radiation than does any other place on Earth, yet the temperatures are so cold and the ice cap is reflective, so that little polar ice melts during the summer; otherwise, the water levels of the oceans would rise 250 feet and engulf most of the world’s great cities.



    1. is reflective, so that little polar ice melts during the summer; otherwise,

    2. is so reflective that little of the polar ice melts during the summer; were it to do so,

    3. so reflective that little polar ice melts during the summer, or else

    4. reflective, so that little of the polar ice melts during the summer, or
    5. reflects so that little of the polar ice melts during the summer; if it did

    看了以前大家分别对这两题的讨论,虽然在一个帖子中有前辈也将它们放在一起进行比较并提问,但好像没有引起注意,现在我想把它们再翻出来重新比较一下,请NN们指教!


    如果说gwd5-1这题选E没有太多争论了的话(曾经有人在考场上以身试法),那么我觉得gwd3-10的C选项可能比B选项好。因为从gwd5-1的E选项我们可以推知,be动词在单复数不同的情况下仍旧可以省略,那么在gwd3-10中的C选项,省略的单数的be动词也是可以接受的,而且在该题的C选项中or else是“否则”的意思,作用相当于连词,因此它表达的意思远比B选项的“were it to do so”来得清楚。请看Longman对or else的解释:



    or else:used to say that there will be bad result if someone does not do something.


    Hurry up or else we will miss the trains.



    但我在以前的讨论中没有找到有关支持gwd3-10选C选项帖子,不知是前辈没有讨论过还是我没有找到,抑或是我的分析还有严重的缺陷导致错误的结论。Anyway,请NN们再次对这两题进行讨论吧。



    [此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-4 12:43:43编辑过]
    沙发
    发表于 2005-9-4 13:11:00 | 只看该作者

    were it to do so, the water levels of the oceans would rise 250 feet and engulf most of the world’s great cities


    "would" implies the subjunctive.


    I admit that "were it to do so" is not very good. But B is the best but not the perfect answer.

    板凳
    发表于 2005-9-4 13:18:00 | 只看该作者

    "or else" is wrong bcoz it violates the meaning of the sentence.


    "or else" is used to say some bad results would HAPPEN.


    but from the sentence completed with choice C, " yet the temperatures are so cold and the ice cap so reflective that little polar ice melts during the summer", the fact is "little polar ice melts during the summer", so "the water levels of the oceans would rise 250 feet and engulf most of the world’s great cities" would not happen. right?


    Thus to use a subjunctive is more acccurate. it is just an imagination.

    地板
    发表于 2008-7-18 18:44:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用cher6068在2005-9-4 12:38:00的发言:

    如果说gwd5-1这题选E没有太多争论了的话(曾经有人在考场上以身试法),那么我觉得gwd3-10的C选项可能比B选项好。因为从gwd5-1的E选项我们可以推知,be动词在单复数不同的情况下仍旧可以省略.



    请问各位战友,这点已经被证实了吗? 我由于2套题目挨着一起,在做GWD5-1的时候忧郁了好久.希望见多识广者指正下.

    5#
    发表于 2008-7-18 18:47:00 | 只看该作者

    才发现这是我搜出来的考古帖.不知道大家看明白我的疑问没有.

    我是想问 be动词的省略的问题, 前后功能一致时要省略.(prep笔记上说的)

    那当单复数不同时呢?

    6#
    发表于 2008-7-18 19:42:00 | 只看该作者

    没有人解答吗...顶下

    7#
    发表于 2008-7-19 09:56:00 | 只看该作者

    再顶

    8#
    发表于 2008-7-19 10:13:00 | 只看该作者

    这个问题我也烦恼

    不过从我的看到的帖子以及问题来看:

    be动词不一致,仍然可以省略;同见3-Q10,be动词不一致,仍然省略(时态不一致才不可以)
    章振邦语法中提到:
    Correct: They live in him together and he ( ) in them.
    Wrong: They live in him together and he live in them.

    这个还需要更多的题目来检验

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    IESE MBA
    近期活动

    正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 05:22
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部