ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1180|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全153,229

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-3-19 06:06:00 | 只看该作者

请教大全153,229



153. At the time of
the Mexican agrarian revolution, the most radical faction, that of Zapata and
his followers, proposed a return to communal ownership of land, to what had
been a pre-Columbian form of ownership respected by the Spaniards
.



(A) land, to what had been a pre-Columbian form of
ownership respected by the Spaniards



(B) land, a form of ownership of the pre-Columbians and
respected by the Spaniards



(C) land, respected by the Spaniards and a pre-Columbian
form of ownership



(D) land in which a pre-Columbian form of ownership was
respected by the Spaniards(A)



(E) land that had been a pre-Columbian form of ownership
respected by the Spaniards

Key : A

看不明白两个to之间的关系,哪位NN能给解释一下?



229. Crises in
international diplomacy do not always result from malice; for nations, like
individuals, can find
themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to
back down.



(A) do not always result from malice; for nations, like
individuals, can find



(B) do not always results from malice; nations, just as
individuals, finding



(C) do not always results from malice; nations, such as
individuals, can find



(D) aren’t always the results of malice; nations in the
same way that individuals can find(A)



(E) aren’t resulting always from malice; just like
individuals who can find

Key: A

虽然用排除法可以选出A,还是想请教一下为什么nations前要加for?





沙发
发表于 2006-3-20 07:11:00 | 只看该作者
1. Proposed a return to communal ownership + (proposed a return) to what..., the two TOs create the parallel structure in this sentence.

2. The FOR here is equivalent to "because".
板凳
发表于 2006-3-20 07:58:00 | 只看该作者

1. Proposed a return to communal ownership + (proposed a return) to what..., the two TOs create the parallel structure in this sentence.

2. The FOR here is equivalent to "because


yaoyao99所说我有点想不明白


1如果是平行结构,那么Proposed a return to communal ownership 和oposed a return) to what...是不是同样的意思说了两遍了??语意重复,

地板
发表于 2006-3-20 09:00:00 | 只看该作者
Exactly.  That's why the second "proposed a return" is implied and not mentioned explictly in the sentence.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 06:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部