AAA22集思广益中参加讨论提高自己惠及他人

感谢版主赐教

有一点：undevelopment land 有可能是wasteland.

The author assume that the land Greenspace, Incwanted to develop is a home of animals and plants. However there is no specific information to support this assumption.

我的思路：

1/ false analogy: 认为M的其他下属公司不会保护环境G就一定不会保护环境。

2/ assumption: constructing a park in on the outskirts of River City will bring pollution rather than improve the environment of the River City.

3/ irrational appeals: 不理智的呼吁。

There is no evidence to prove the suggestion that consumers should refuse to purchase products of M company to force it to abandon the project is the best way to solve current environment problems.

这里作者是否在假设： G公司尽管宣称要盖公园，事实是要建房子。所以才呼吁大家不买其产品直至他放弃盖房子的计划。可是他没有给出证据G要发展房地产。所以是无端假设。

还有，作者提议，其他子公司没有保护环境，为了不要污染环境，不买G的产品。可是，不保护和污染是不同概念。不保护也许只是对环境没有危害，不一定就污染了。