ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1076|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP 61

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-1-10 16:24:00 | 只看该作者

PREP 61

原题如下:
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

A. it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who

B. it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors

C. appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors

D. appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors (D)

E. appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who

此题答案是D

但我的疑问是,是否可以把“what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground ...”为一个含有主语从句的复合句。这个复合句作为介词FROM的宾语?从语法上有问题吗?


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-1-10 16:26:59编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-1-10 16:58:00 | 只看该作者
"what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground": If we convert it into an independent sentence, it should be "It appears (that) sth was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground." But when "it appears" is used to lead a sentence, "that" which I put in round brackets must not be dropped. But even if the original object was "what it appears that was an ancient...", contrasted with item D, still, this expression is a bit awkward.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-3 05:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部