ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1073|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

补充题179

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-12-22 07:02:00 | 只看该作者

补充题179



179. With diamonds,
as with all gems, one should ask for a written description of one’s purchase;
the description may prove useful later if you have reason to believe the
jeweler misled you.



(A) one should ask for a written
description of one’s purchase



(B) you should ask for a written
description of your purchase



(C) a written discretion of your
purchase is what one should ask for



(D) a written description of one’s
purchase is what should be asked for(B)



(E) a written description of your
purchase is what should be asked for

答案是B,我选了E,主要是因为前面的with diamonds, 我觉得应该意思是“对于钻石来说”,感觉用物做主语更好吧。



沙发
发表于 2005-12-22 14:10:00 | 只看该作者

顶一下,我对With的用法也是很头痛!我也问了一个关于with的逻辑主语的问题,可是还没有回答,这个题目中,e比较awkward.虽然这个awkard比较难界定,但是这个被动用得不好。


还请教这里with为什么可以modify you.


谢谢

板凳
发表于 2005-12-22 21:58:00 | 只看该作者

解题的关键不在with, 未画线部分 the description may prove useful later if you have reason to believe the jeweler misled you.


>>

地板
发表于 2005-12-23 00:22:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢斑竹解释,境界果然不一样!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 23:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部