ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3610|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Prep1-186 查过之前的帖子,问题没有解决

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-2-22 13:46:00 | 只看该作者

Prep1-186 查过之前的帖子,问题没有解决

186.    (31792-!-item-!-188;#058&006164)

Laos has a land area about the same as Great Britain but only 4 million in population, where many
    
are members of hill tribes ensconced in the virtually inaccessible mountain valleys of the north.
A. about the same as Great Britain but only 4 million in population, where many
B. of about the same size as Great Britain is, but in Laos there is a population of only 4 million, and many
C. that is about the same size as Great Britain's land area, but in Laos with a population of only 4 million people, many of them
D. comparable to the size of Great Britain, but only 4 million in population, and many
E. comparable to that of Great Britain but a population of only 4 million people, many of whom
答案e

看过之前的帖子http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&replyid=3291731&id=370279&page=1&skin=0&Star=1 可问题还没有解决,请nn帮忙

如果e是一个比较省略句,Laos has a land area comparable to that of Great Britain but (Laos has )a population of only 4 million people, many of whom
那d不能这么理解吗?之前nn也说这个size 和area 是可以比较的,那d问题出在哪里?

谢谢大n指点




沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-23 23:17:00 | 只看该作者
我顶,nn快出来萨
板凳
发表于 2009-2-23 23:45:00 | 只看该作者
D. comparable to the size of Great Britain, but only 4 million in population, and many

个人看法,这里的but only 4 million in population,看成是插入结构。

因为如果看成主语及相同动词(has)省略。那么这个表达 Laos has only 4 million in population肯定是unidiomatic的。

这里更合理的解释是作为 一个 “无动词分句”,相当于a book in hand一类结构,也是独立主格的一种。用来修饰Laos。但是这样问题就更大,修饰对象Laos和其修饰词像个太远了。当中还有一个Britain。这种混乱的修饰是gmat不能容忍的。
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-2-24 0:03:06编辑过]
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-24 11:59:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用alohabrian在2009-2-23 23:45:00的发言:
D. comparable to the size of Great Britain, but only 4 million in population, and many

个人看法,这里的but only 4 million in population,看成是插入结构。

因为如果看成主语及相同动词(has)省略。那么这个表达 Laos has only 4 million in population肯定是unidiomatic的。

这里更合理的解释是作为 一个 “无动词分句”,相当于a book in hand一类结构,也是独立主格的一种。用来修饰Laos。但是这样问题就更大,修饰对象Laos和其修饰词像个太远了。当中还有一个Britain。这种混乱的修饰是gmat不能容忍的。

    

非常清楚,太感谢alohabrian
我就是不知道这个表达 Laos has only 4 million in population问题出在哪里?
别鄙视我,我的基础不好


5#
发表于 2009-2-24 12:07:00 | 只看该作者
应该说Laos has a population of 4 million,或者 4 million in population, Lao is...

Laos has only 4 million in population类似于 I have 4 dollars in money.好awkward阿。

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-24 13:42:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用alohabrian在2009-2-24 12:07:00的发言:
应该说Laos has a population of 4 million,或者 4 million in population, Lao is...

Laos has only 4 million in population类似于 I have 4 dollars in money.好awkward阿。

原来是这样的!!!
太,太感谢了,这个例子让我完全明白了

再次谢谢这位大nn
7#
发表于 2009-3-2 21:51:00 | 只看该作者

句子结构为:

laos has a land area comparable to that of Great Britain but a population of only 4 million people, many of whom...

 

A. but 连接前后无对等部分:整句或相应成分。Where无指代。

B. has there is 不对等。Only的位置错,改变原意。Many的出现使句子变成三个分句,意思改变。改变主句的平衡。Many of them 修饰a population of only 4 million
        
,用法idiomatic.

C. but连接的两部分不平衡,前面是句子,has…;  后面是短语,with…;   Many of them 修饰a population of only 4 million
        
,没有建立前后的修饰关系,也没有连词,使得句子run on.

D. but连接的两部分不平衡, 前面是has+n,后面是4 million in population,造成segment.

E. 正确。but正确连接了两个名词结构,造成平行,many of whom,修饰4 million people,非限定性定语从句避免run-on

请指正。

8#
发表于 2009-3-3 16:10:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用balabaladou7在2009-3-2 21:51:00的发言:

句子结构为:

laos has a land area comparable to that of Great Britain but a population of only 4 million people, many of whom...

 

 

A. but 连接前后无对等部分:整句或相应成分。Where无指代。

B. has there is 不对等。Only的位置错,改变原意。Many的出现使句子变成三个分句,意思改变。改变主句的平衡。Many of them 修饰a population of only 4 million
  
,用法idiomatic.

C. but连接的两部分不平衡,前面是句子,has…;  后面是短语,with…;   Many of them 修饰a population of only 4 million
  
,没有建立前后的修饰关系,也没有连词,使得句子run on.

D. but连接的两部分不平衡, 前面是has+n,后面是4 million in population,造成segment.

E. 正确。but正确连接了两个名词结构,造成平行,many of whom,修饰4 million people,非限定性定语从句避免run-on

请指正。

大牛!赞!Thanks a lot!!!

9#
发表于 2009-3-4 04:25:00 | 只看该作者
umm...just want to add more:
- C不會造成run-on sentence, 因為句子結構是: Laos has a land area..., but in Laos..., many of them are members....
- "but"用在句子並列時不要求絶對的平衡, let's look at some examples:

prep2-29: No longer do many cities in the United States have a river as the focal point of urban life, but in San Antonio the river winds through the middle of the business district, and the River Walk, or Paseo del Rio, is the city's most popular attraction.

prep2:109: Unlike psychiatrists, who are trained as medical doctors, psychologists have historically been forbidden to prescribe drugs for their patients, but in 2002 New Mexico began granting prescribing privileges to licensed, doctoral level psychologists who complete an additional training and certification program.

"but"用在句子並列時能平衡當然好, 不能完美的平衡也可以接受..
10#
发表于 2009-3-4 08:55:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用AlienX在2009-3-4 4:25:00的发言:
umm...just want to add more:
- C不會造成run-on sentence, 因為句子結構是: Laos has a land area..., but in Laos..., many of them are members....
- "but"用在句子並列時不要求絶對的平衡, let's look at some examples:

prep2-29: No longer do many cities in the United States have a river as the focal point of urban life, but in San Antonio the river winds through the middle of the business district, and the River Walk, or Paseo del Rio, is the city's most popular attraction.

prep2:109: Unlike psychiatrists, who are trained as medical doctors, psychologists have historically been forbidden to prescribe drugs for their patients, but in 2002 New Mexico began granting prescribing privileges to licensed, doctoral level psychologists who complete an additional training and certification program.

"but"用在句子並列時能平衡當然好, 不能完美的平衡也可以接受..

多谢指出这个问题。也同意but并不要求绝对平衡。

这里并不是说but要求绝对平衡,但针对一个特定的题的考点来说,5个选项进行比较,要靠哪个主考点来判断呢?

不过此题如果不用平行来判断,我上面的分析的主要思路就错了。

请指出合适的方式进行排除。

thanks


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-4 8:56:42编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 05:06
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部