ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 876|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Lsat 26-3-10

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-10-30 21:40:00 | 只看该作者

Lsat 26-3-10

If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one less vehicle emitting pollution into the air than there would be otherwise. Therefore if people would walk whenever it is feasible for them to do so, then pollution will be greatly reduced.> >

>

10. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthen the argument?> >


(A) If automobile passengers who never drive walk instead of ride, there will be fewer vehicles on the road as a result.> >


(B) Nonmoving running vehicles, on average, emit half as much pollution per second as moving vehicles, but the greater congestion is , the more nonmoving running vehicles there are.> >


(C) Since different vehicles can pollute at different rates, it is possible for one drive who walks to make a greater contribution to pollution prevention than another driver who walks.>


(D) On average, buses pollute more than cars do, but buses usually carry more passengers than cars do.


(E) Those who previously rode as passengers in a vehicle whose driver decides to walk instead of drive might themselves decide to drive.


答案是B,为什么,哪位大牛帮忙解释下?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 03:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部