ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1572|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] OG2016 14 形容词引导的从句为何不用加that?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-11-8 21:23:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Many experts regarded the large increase in credit card borrowing in march not as
a sign that household were pressed for cash and forced to borrow, rather a sign of
confidence by households that they could safely handle new debt.
(d) but as a sign that households were confident they could safely

d是正确选项,只是无法理解为何 confident 后面直接跟 they could safely,而不是 confident that they could safely...

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2017-11-8 21:27:24 | 只看该作者
OG上另一道题给出的解答 : It is awkward and confusing to string together relative clauses: evidence that suggests that the elephant. ...

Many experts regarded the large increase in credit card borrowing in march not as a sign that household were pressed for cash and forced to borrow, but as a sign that households were confident they could safely handle new debt.

在这里似乎还有转移句子重心的问题?
not as a sign that household were pressed for cash and forced to borrow
but as a sign that households were confident they could safely handle new debt
but as a sign that households were confident that they could safely handle new debt
如果加了that感觉句意就变成了 家庭对于很自信 XX 弱化了后半句的句意
而原句的是 家庭对于妥善的处理新的负债很有自信
不知道这样理解是否正确







板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2017-11-8 21:51:07 | 只看该作者
SHJ877 发表于 2017-11-8 21:27
OG上另一道题给出的解答 : It is awkward and confusing to string together relative clauses: evidence t ...

也就是说两个that不能离得太近了?
地板
发表于 2017-11-8 22:37:50 | 只看该作者
hamuco 发表于 2017-11-8 21:51
也就是说两个that不能离得太近了?

根据OG上这个解释 把两个that引导的relative clauses放的太近 至少是不好吧?
我也刚开始接触G 有不对的请多请教
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-14 20:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部