ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1656|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] OG16 SC17 求助

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-10-15 11:10:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
17. A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly’s exploits included circling the globe faster than Jules Verne’s fictional Phileas Fogg.
(A) A pioneer journalist, Nellie Bly’s exploits included
(B) The exploits of Nellie Bly, a pioneer journalist, included
(C) Nellie Bly was a pioneer journalist including in her exploits the
(D) Included in the pioneer journalist Nellie Bly’s exploits are
(E) The pioneer journalist’s exploits of Nellie Bly included


C The wording of this version is illogical because it makesNellie Bly the subject of the verb including
OG 说including是Nellie Bly的动词 可是看MANHATTAN语法书里讲  Any -ing word functioning as part of the verb form will have another verb immediately before it, as in the is playing example. If no prior verb exists, then the -ing word is not acting as a verb.

感觉像是Noun modifer但是句意上又解释不通
刚开始准备GMAT 求NN解答
                                
                        
               

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2017-10-16 08:30:21 | 只看该作者

OG16 -121


[Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.] Use of the present progressive form of the verb confuses the sequence of time with respect to the past tense of the main verb capitalized
这里的coordinating不应该是做adverbial modifier修饰前面的内容吗?为什么OG解析说会让使事件发生顺序混乱?求NN解答
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2017-10-16 09:17:50 | 只看该作者

Unlike the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants, which are, situated underground or in pieces of wood, raider ants make a portable nest by entwining their long legs to form “curtains” of ants that hang from logs or boulders, providing protection for the queen and the colony larvae and pupae.

OG Also, the referent of the relative pronoun which is ambiguous, possibly modifying ants, and possibly modifying nests.
Manhattan 上说 Again, the relative pronoun which must refer to the main noun closest to the which.
如果这样的话 指代的就应该是ants 为什么还会存在指代不清的情况呢
地板
发表于 2017-10-16 11:53:31 | 只看该作者
5#
发表于 2017-10-17 04:55:37 | 只看该作者
17.在原句中,a pioneer journalist是NB的同位语,强调的应该是include,C就改变了原意。
6#
发表于 2017-10-17 05:04:55 | 只看该作者
121 in her book illustration, 前后有两个逗号,都是属于它的,它就是一个插入语,在句中不做任何成分。所以V-ing修饰的是BP。
cooperate&capitalize有先后顺序,有先后顺序的词用并列形式表达
7#
发表于 2017-10-17 05:07:53 | 只看该作者
the nests of leaf cutters and most other ants
A of B,在of结构中,that&which应该要修饰A
8#
发表于 2017-10-17 17:21:31 | 只看该作者
其實應該是在語義上錯誤地修飾了pioneer journalist。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-15 18:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部