ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1657|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SOS]TWE182 下周就考了 帮忙看下呢 3Q

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-27 14:21:00 | 只看该作者

[SOS]TWE182 下周就考了 帮忙看下呢 3Q

首先say辛苦各位了  汗 刚才居然发错版 丢人~~~这次要确定不能发错了


182 Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.



It is a constant debate as to weather to have a close relationship with pets will benefit people. Although some people may reject pets a lot, as far as my considerations, I could hardly to do so. I will present my view as follows.


  To begin with, the loyalty of pets, especially those of dogs, are permitted by everyone. In this highly competitive society, a saying of  “a friend of yesterday may become an enemy of tomorrow” is realized by many people. This lead the feeling of insecurity and helpless exist in most people's mind. Here, most effectible solution for those who need to be soothed, pets come along. Through the communication and interaction with pets, people can easily put the heavy load down and become more reliable and comfortable after the challenges of society. Obviously, to have such a relationship with pets are a desirable choice of individuals.


  Next, pets can satisfy people's tendency of taking care of someone, this is mostly happened among elders and youngers. After the retirement, most elders have the feeling of doing nothing and useless to anyone. At this point, pets can not only accompany with them but also satisfy their willing of contributing. Simultaneously, while children are cared and spoiled by others pet is necessarily needed in order to build their sense of responsibility to think and care about others. Therefore, such benefits have shown that such relationship is not a harmful choice at all.


  It has to be admitted that there may have some side effects when rising pets, such as the virus that the pets carry. This is such a terrible for some individuals to reject pets, because this can be surly reduced, even eliminated by proper methods such as bathing consequently and injecting the vaccine in time.


  In a final glance, I do believe that the disadvantages have no enough weights to overwhelm those of advantages. Therefore, the close relationship between pets and people are necessary needed by the human society.

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-27 14:22:00 | 只看该作者

语法时态超滥 简直就不知道那些dd所云


大家多多批评~~~ 8知道这样能几分   嘿嘿


抄了句一位牛mm的作文句子   实在不好意思 偶把她名字忘了


实在不本分 吃水忘了挖井人~汗



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-27 14:25:36编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2005-8-28 15:57:00 | 只看该作者

182 Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.



It is a constant debate as to weather to (应当为whether)have a close relationship with pets will benefit people. Although some people may reject pets a lot, as far as my considerations, I could hardly to (删)do so. I will present my view as follows.


  To begin with, the loyalty of pets, especially those of (删)dogs, are permitted by everyone. In this highly competitive society, a saying of  “a friend of yesterday may become an enemy of tomorrow” is realized by many people. This lead the feeling of insecurity and helpless (应当有名词)exist (和前面的lead是两个谓语,但同一句话不能有两个谓语)in most people's mind. Here, most effectible (efficient)solution for those who need to be soothed, pets come along. Through the communication and interaction with pets, people can easily put the heavy load down and become more reliable and comfortable after the challenges of society. Obviously, to have such a relationship with pets are a desirable choice of individuals.(people)


Next, pets can satisfy people's tendency of taking care of someone, this is mostly happened among elders and youngers. (两句话没有连词,是严重语法错误)After the retirement, most elders have the feeling of doing nothing and useless to anyone(and前后要一致,和doing nothing 的结构不符合;如果是和have并列,那么要是动词形式). At this point, pets can not only accompany with them but also satisfy their willing (不是名词)of contributing. Simultaneously, while children are cared and spoiled by others pet is necessarily needed in order to build their sense(senses) of responsibility to think(删) and care about others. Therefore, such benefits have shown that such relationship is not a harmful choice at all.


  It has to be admitted that there may have some side effects when rising (to cultivate) pets, such as the virus that the pets carry. This is such a terrible for some individuals to reject pets, because this can be surly reduced, even eliminated by proper methods such as bathing consequently and injecting the vaccine in time.


  In a final glance, I do believe that the disadvantages have no enough weights to overwhelm those of advantages. Therefore, the close relationship between pets and people are necessary (应当用副词)needed by the human society.

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-29 09:30:00 | 只看该作者

多谢 指点~~错的还真吓人~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-25 12:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部