ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1461|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og 68 conj + conj 是不是错了?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-17 20:40:00 | 只看该作者

og 68 conj + conj 是不是错了?

68. Often visible as smog, ozone is formed in the


atmosphere from hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides, two major pollutants emitted by automobiles, react with sunlight.


(A)  ozone is formed in the atmosphere from


(B)  ozone is formed in the atmosphere when


(C)  ozone is formed in the atmosphere, and when


(D)  ozone, formed in the atmosphere when


(E)   ozone, formed in the atmosphere from


In choice A, the construction from hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides ... react is ungrammatical. In B, the best choice, the conjunction when replaces the preposition from, producing a grammatical and logical statement. In choice C, the use of the conjunction and results in the illogical assertion that the formation of ozone in the atmosphere happens in addition to, rather than as a result of, its formation when hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxide react with sunlight. Choice D omits the main verb, is, leaving a sentence fragment. E compounds the error of D with that of A.




,and when 是不是错了呢? 好像从来没有见到过conj + conj + SVO.



谢谢大家


沙发
发表于 2005-8-17 21:01:00 | 只看该作者

感觉上应该是因情况而定的:


比如这样的并列情况:when。。。,when。。。, and when。。。。


大家继续讨论

板凳
发表于 2005-8-17 21:16:00 | 只看该作者

同意楼上说法。例子也很恰当。


只有起同样作用的连词连用才不可以。

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-24 17:58:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢两位大侠帮助! 小弟懂了。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-14 00:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部