ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2468|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教补充题101

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-15 10:22:00 | 只看该作者

请教补充题101

101. The speculative fever of the Roaring Twenties infected rich and poor alike; vast quantities of people were dangerously overextended, credit was absurdly easy to obtain, and most brokerage houses required only ten percent cash for stocks bought on “margin.”(P2 F-2)


(A) rich and poor alike; vast quantities of people were dangerously overextended


(B) both rich and poor alike; large amounts of people dangerously overextended themselves


(C) rich and poor alike; great numbers of people were dangerously overextended


(D) both rich and poor alike; vast amounts of people dangerously overextended themselvesC


(E) both rich and poor; great quantities of people were dangerously overextended


A为何错,是因为vast的缘故吗?

沙发
发表于 2005-7-15 11:27:00 | 只看该作者

不对呀,我觉得答案是E呀

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-15 14:45:00 | 只看该作者
我也选了E,查了答案是C,难道答案有误?没人有异议。
地板
发表于 2005-7-15 14:51:00 | 只看该作者
LZM的语法精解中,vast quantities 和 large amounts 只能修饰不可数名词. 所以只有C对
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-15 14:58:00 | 只看该作者
我查了字典,quantities of 可以修饰可数也可以修饰不可数名词啊。和LZM的解释有冲突啊,问题出哪儿呀?晕~~~
6#
发表于 2005-7-15 15:19:00 | 只看该作者

quantities of是可以修饰复数的,amount(s)of 是不可以的;刘振民语法里也没有说到quantities of不能修饰可数名词复数,请看到刘振民〈GMAT语法改错精解〉P22 第4行

7#
发表于 2005-7-15 15:37:00 | 只看该作者
哦, 我记错了.
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-15 16:27:00 | 只看该作者
A到底错哪儿呀,有谁能帮忙解释一下?
9#
发表于 2005-9-1 08:33:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得可能是用quantities来修饰people不太好。我也选得E。
10#
发表于 2005-9-2 06:51:00 | 只看该作者

E 一上来就应该排除的.


原文的意思是对富人和穷人的传染差不多. 但E把句子改成传染富人也传染穷人. 两个意思不一样.


quantities形容人不太符合语法习惯. number很顺.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-11 14:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部