- UID
- 1119793
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2015-6-6
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.
(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it
正确答案是B,OG解释如下:
Conditional constructions require specific verb tenses. For a past condition, the subordinate clause introduced by if uses the past indicative, and the main clause uses the conditional if x happened, then y would happen.
A Verb was should be the conditional would be; wordy and imprecise.
B Correct. This clear, concise sentence correctly uses the conditional would never be.
C Verb was should be the conditional would be; pronoun it is ambiguous and could refer to either Morocco or Algeria.
D It, not that, should be used to refer back to Morocco; could never be secure about their grip is awkward.
E Inverted word order is awkward and confusing;it could refer to either Morocco or Algeria.
答案B中without it their grip.... 我怎么也看不明白啊?为什么两个代词在这里啊?求大神指导一下! 再有,如果A变为:if they did not hold it, their girp on Algeria would be always insecure是不是就对了呢?
|
|