OG186?

186. Judge Bonham denied a motion to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to a hotel.

(A) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of to confine them to

(B) that would have allowed members of the jury to go home at the end of each day instead of confined to

(C) under which members of the jury are allowed to go home at the end of each day instead of confining them in

(D) that would allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than confinement in（E）

(E) to allow members of the jury to go home at the end of each day rather than be confined to

In this sentence, members of the jury are presented with two options: they may (1) go home or (2) be confined to a hotel. The rejected motion would have allowed them to do the first rather than [to] suffer the second. Members of the jury must be the logical subject of both options, and both must be expressed in parallel form, that is, as infinitive clauses. E, the best choice, observes these requirements. In A and C, the phrase members of the jury is not the logical subject of the second option, to confine them or confining them, since jury members are not doing the confining. In B and D, confined and confinement are not infinitives and

AE比较，A中为什么不可以视作allow和confine并列，让它们俩的逻辑主语一致？

可以参考以前的讨论贴，

  【讨论连接】─ ─ GMAT语法讨论汇总  [ 2 3 4 5 6]

发新贴前先看看这个会对你有帮助的：

  【发帖必读】─ ─ GMAT语法区版规  [ 2 3]

祝顺利！